These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9513108)

  • 21. Dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane impression material reproducing the sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Levy G; Brosh T; Harel N; Ganor Y; Pilo R
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23370867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contour determination for ovate pontics.
    Dylina TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 10424974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of the setting stage on the accuracy of double-mix impressions made with addition-curing silicone.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 8083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.
    Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Ganor Y; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 8933434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material to correct a defect in complete denture definitive impressions.
    Oh WS; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25444280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stable matrix for amalgam build-up.
    Esquivel JF; Welsch BB
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 10687468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Making a great impression.
    Mechanic E
    Dent Today; 2010 Dec; 29(12):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 21229926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The global impression technic in fixed dentures].
    Lamy M; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 16193850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings.
    Gelbard S; Aoskar Y; Zalkind M; Stern N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
    Kollefrath R; Savary M; Schwela J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.