122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9514591)
1. Exact elods and exact power for affected sib pairs analyzed for linkage under simple right and wrong models.
Hodge SE
Am J Med Genet; 1998 Feb; 81(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 9514591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power of the affected-sib-pair method for heterogeneous disorders.
Goldin LR; Gershon ES
Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3282981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power of non-parametric linkage analysis in mapping genes contributing to human longevity in long-lived sib-pairs.
Tan Q; Zhao JH; Iachine I; Hjelmborg J; Vach W; Vaupel JW; Christensen K; Kruse TA
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 26(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15022210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
Knapp M; Strauch K
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do bilineal pedigrees represent a problem for linkage analysis? Basic principles and simulation results for single-gene diseases with no heterogeneity.
Hodge SE
Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 1521781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of lod scores.
Greenberg DA
Am J Med Genet; 1989 Dec; 34(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 2624256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs.
Dudoit S; Speed TP
Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12933522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of type I error probabilities for heterogeneity LOD scores.
Abreu PC; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):156-69. PubMed ID: 11788961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of the affected sib pair method to detect linkage of a sex-linked dominant disease with a sex-linked recessive trait.
Chakraborty R
Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):281-6. PubMed ID: 2786486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting linkage disequilibrium in the presence of locus heterogeneity.
Wang D; Huang J
Ann Hum Genet; 2006 May; 70(Pt 3):397-409. PubMed ID: 16674561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and robustness of a score test for linkage analysis of quantitative traits using identity by descent data on sib pairs.
Goldstein DR; Dudoit S; Speed TP
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):415-31. PubMed ID: 11319783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power comparison of generalizations of the mean test for affected sib pairs in case of incompletely informative markers.
Knapp M
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 16550593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using lod scores to detect sex differences in male-female recombination fractions.
Feenstra B; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
Hum Hered; 2004; 57(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15192282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
Motro U; Thomson G
Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
