These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9515434)
1. Complaint review procedures of state licensing boards. Eckstein EC Gen Dent; 1997; 45(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 9515434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sanctions and recidivism: an evaluation of physician discipline by state medical boards. Grant D; Alfred KC J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Oct; 32(5):867-85. PubMed ID: 17855720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Views of physicians, disciplinary board members and practicing lawyers on the new statutory disciplinary system for health care in The Netherlands. Cuperus-Bosma JM; Hout FA; Hubben JH; van der Wal G Health Policy; 2006 Jul; 77(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 16125274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on American dental licensure: a European community model. Paul DP Health Mark Q; 2000; 18(1-2):87-98. PubMed ID: 11184438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The regulation of dental licensing: the dark ages? Friedland B; Valachovic RW Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1785620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tipping the balance at 53.6%. Casamassimo PS Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):280-1. PubMed ID: 20836945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting the public: state medical board licensure policies for active and inactive physicians. Freed GL; Dunham KM; Abraham L; Pediatrics; 2009 Feb; 123(2):643-52. PubMed ID: 19171633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Board of Medical Practice. Can it protect the public and meet physician needs? Boche HL Minn Med; 1993 May; 76(5):7-9. PubMed ID: 8505923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Licensure based upon graduation or the real issue in protecting the public. Nash DA J Dent Educ; 1992 Apr; 56(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 1640015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in review (or, how to avoid tangling with the Board of Dental Examiners). Zimmerman BJ J Colo Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 73(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 9470589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting health care professionals to state licensing boards--VA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Apr; 63(83):23664-5. PubMed ID: 10179324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complaints against dentists]. Vermaire JH; Eijkman MA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Jan; 108(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11383269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing quality in dentistry: dental boards, peer review vary on disciplinary actions. Damiano PC; Shugars DA; Freed JR J Am Dent Assoc; 1993 May; 124(5):113-31. PubMed ID: 8482767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]