BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9515442)

  • 1. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 2: Further studies and clinical technique.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 9515443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observation of an amalgam-bonded tooth through a scanning electron microscope.
    Orosa JL
    N Y State Dent J; 2003; 69(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 13677864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
    Hernandez AI; Roongruangphol T; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal integrity of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Tarim B; Suzuki S; Suzuki S; Cox CF
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9522690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations.
    Magne P; Kim TH; Cascione D; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 16316797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD; Vance RI
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.