These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9515442)

  • 21. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adhesives, silver amalgam.
    Oral Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):49-50, 52. PubMed ID: 8779743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation.
    Muniz M; Quioca J; Dolci GS; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 15853109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical performance and SEM evaluation of direct composite restorations in primary molars.
    Puppin-Rontani RM; de Góes MF; Voelske CE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 17073199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB; Neme AM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.
    Estafan D; Estafan A; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.