92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9515715)
1. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic correction of the interfering effect of unsuppressed interspersed repetitive sequences in comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Maahr J; Rose H; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1997 Jun; 28(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9181302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization.
Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Christensen B; Bryndorf T; Bentz M; Lichter P; Gerdes T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 7705184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CGH in the detection of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) in placentas of abnormal pregnancies.
Amiel A; Bouaron N; Kidron D; Sharony R; Gaber E; Fejgin MD
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):752-8. PubMed ID: 12224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in children with idiopathic mental retardation by array based comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH).
Schoumans J; Ruivenkamp C; Holmberg E; Kyllerman M; Anderlid BM; Nordenskjöld M
J Med Genet; 2005 Sep; 42(9):699-705. PubMed ID: 16141005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis by comparative genomic hybridization of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination and/or positive peritoneal cytology.
Morohara K; Nakao K; Tajima Y; Nishino N; Yamazaki K; Kaetsu T; Suzuki S; Tsunoda A; Kawamura M; Aida T; Tachikawa T; Kusano M
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Aug; 161(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 16080958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer: a comparison between cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization.
Persson K; Pandis N; Mertens F; Borg A; Baldetorp B; Killander D; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Jun; 25(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 10337995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.
Casas S; Aventín A; Fuentes F; Vallespí T; Granada I; Carrió A; Angel Martínez-Climent J; Solé F; Teixidó M; Bernués M; Duarte J; Maria Hernández J; Brunet S; Dolors Coll M; Sierra J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Aug; 153(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15325089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for detecting and characterizing constitutional chromosome abnormalities.
Ness GO; Lybaek H; Houge G
Am J Med Genet; 2002 Nov; 113(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 12407702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of genomic imbalances in glioblastoma multiforme using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization.
Vranová V; Necesalová E; Kuglík P; Cejpek P; Pesáková M; Budínská E; Relichová J; Veselská R
Oncol Rep; 2007 Feb; 17(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 17203188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnosis of cryptic chromosome aberrations].
Ness GO; Houge G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Sep; 123(17):2418-21. PubMed ID: 14562774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
