These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9516696)

  • 1. Effect of electromyogram-force relationships and method of gain estimation on the predictions of an electromyogram-driven model of spinal loading.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Marras WS; Granata KP; Reinsel TE; Simon S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Feb; 23(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 9516696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads during fatiguing repetitive trunk exertions.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Dec; 23(23):2563-73. PubMed ID: 9854755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuromuscular trunk performance and spinal loading during a fatiguing isometric trunk extension with varying torque requirements.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Marras WS; Granata KP; Reinsel TE; Simon S
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Apr; 10(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 9113613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An electromyography-assisted model to estimate trunk muscle forces during fatiguing repetitive trunk exertions.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Dec; 12(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 10598994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wavelet analysis of electromyography for back muscle fatigue detection during isokinetic constant-torque exertions.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M; Barria EA; Jagadeesh JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1791-8. PubMed ID: 10488509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalizability of trunk muscle EMG and spinal forces.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2001; 20(6):72-81. PubMed ID: 11838261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The in vivo dynamic response of the human spine to rapid lateral bend perturbation: effects of preload and step input magnitude.
    Chiang J; Potvin JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1457-64. PubMed ID: 11458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-abdominal pressure increases during exhausting back extension in humans.
    Essendrop M; Schibye B; Hye-Knudsen C
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Jun; 87(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12070628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk antagonist co-activation is associated with impaired neuromuscular performance.
    Reeves NP; Cholewicki J; Milner T; Lee AS
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 188(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 18443772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.
    Skotte JH; Essendrop M; Hansen AF; Schibye B
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 12231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trunk muscle co-contraction increases during fatiguing, isometric, lateral bend exertions. Possible implications for spine stability.
    Potvin JR; O'Brien PR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):774-80; discussion 781. PubMed ID: 9563107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total trunk muscle force and spinal compression are lower in asymmetric moments as compared to pure extension moments.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    J Biomech; 1999 Jul; 32(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 10400355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 15804849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks.
    Weston EB; Aurand A; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):853-865. PubMed ID: 29241415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions.
    Marras WS; Granata KP
    J Biomech; 1997 Jul; 30(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 9239549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?
    Cholewicki J; Ivancic PC; Radebold A
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Jun; 87(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 12070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.