156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9517024)
1. [Quality assurance in medicine. Use of technical information methods and tools].
Detschew V; Funkat G; Kaeding A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():11-2. PubMed ID: 9517024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Definition and evaluation of a documentation standard for intensive care medicine: the ASDI(Working Group for Standardization of a documentation system for Intensive care medicine) pilot project].
Metnitz PG; Steltzer H; Popow C; Valentin A; Neumark J; Sagmüller G; Schwameis F; Urschitz M; Mühlbacher F; Hiesmayr M; Lenz K
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1997 Feb; 109(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 9157723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Optimizing a conventional documentation system on the surgical intensive care unit--a contribution to cost reduction and preventive quality management?].
Mohr VD; Dogan N; Haupt W; Bengler K; Zirngibl H; Hohenberger W
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 May; 31(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 8704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Time, medical records and quality assurance--the cost-benefit assessment is a must].
Ericsson M
Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(18):2245-6. PubMed ID: 10850056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficiency of computer-based documentation in long-term care--preliminary project].
Lüngen M; Gerber A; Rupprecht C; Lauterbach KW
Pflege Z; 2008 Jun; 61(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 18605616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Documentation and therapeutic standards in anesthesia and intensive care medicine--means for quality assurance and cost control].
Bach A; Martin E
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8967190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of care in anaesthetic practice: how should it be measured?
Klinck JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1999; 50(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 10418639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [General automated documentation and performance data on the surgical intensive care unit--the theoretical concept of the Regensburg Surgical University Clinic].
Mann S; Wiedmann S; Mann U; Zirngibl H
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1996; 113():314-7. PubMed ID: 9101861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Performance and cost transparency as quality assurance measures].
Brüstle N; Heidrich U; Betzler M
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():778-9. PubMed ID: 9574265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Integration of electronic data processing in clinical follow-up--or adaptation of clinical follow-up to electronic data processing. Meanwhile a question of economic survival?].
Gesenhues T; Frielingsdorf B; Seufert R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M120-5. PubMed ID: 8974889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CPR (computerized patient records)--desirability vs practicality.
Shoemaker P
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(6):24, 26. PubMed ID: 10122847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent process redesign and clinical documentation system implementation: a 6-month success story.
Halley EC; Kambic PM
Top Health Inf Manage; 1996 Aug; 17(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 10159538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Economic recording of performance for managing documentation requirements].
Nerlich M; Gnann W
Chirurg; 1995 Aug; 66(8):suppl 176-80. PubMed ID: 7587530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Radiology information systems: improved performance evaluation, economics and quality assurance?].
Gross-Fengels W; Weber M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 9172663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The case for funding. Wall Street should support health care IT investments.
Hessler FA
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 May; 79(5):suppl 13-4. PubMed ID: 15971803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Three approaches to ROI.
Carpenter D
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 May; 79(5):suppl 9-12. PubMed ID: 15971802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic medical records and economics.
McLean TR; Richards EP
Am J Med; 2010 Jun; 123(6):e11; author reply e13. PubMed ID: 20569737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Basic differential documentation as conditio sine qua non for effective quality assurance].
Winter T
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 1462691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Justifying the cost of a computer-based patient record.
Kian LA; Stewart MW; Bagby C; Robertson J
Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Jul; 49(7):58-60, 62, 64-7. PubMed ID: 10143674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated nursing documentation system provides a favorable return on investment.
Kahl K; Ivancin L; Fuhrmann M
J Nurs Adm; 1991 Nov; 21(11):44-51. PubMed ID: 1941171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
