These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9517025)

  • 1. [Computer-assisted calculation of sectional forces of the femur].
    Schreiber U; Steinhauser E; Kaddick C; Hipp E
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():13-4. PubMed ID: 9517025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of substance and length of intramedullary implant rods of special tumor prostheses on bone canal].
    Steinhauser E; Rechl H; Schaff P; Gradinger R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():378-9. PubMed ID: 9859407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis and biomechanical study on reconstruction of the large defect of proximal femur with allograft prosthesis composite in clinical bone-healing phase].
    Xing B; Duan H; Tu C; Chen H; Luo J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):985-8. PubMed ID: 19947473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fully automated generation of hip prosthesis voxel models of the femur for finite element analysis. Comparison of direct and subsequent prosthesis implantation].
    Schmitt J; Lengsfeld M; Leppek R; Alter P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Jun; 42(6):150-5. PubMed ID: 9312305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of muscle activity on the forces in the femur: an in vivo study.
    Lu TW; Taylor SJ; O'Connor JJ; Walker PS
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 9456377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Numerical studies of the effect of prosthetic implants on the strain energy density distribution in the femur].
    Liefeith K; Kaufhold S; Rost J
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Jun; 43(6):179-83. PubMed ID: 9677759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision Distal Femoral Arthroplasty With the Compress(®) Prosthesis Has a Low Rate of Mechanical Failure at 10 Years.
    Zimel MN; Farfalli GL; Zindman AM; Riedel ER; Morris CD; Boland PJ; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):528-36. PubMed ID: 26394638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
    Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Load bearing capacity of CFK hip prosthesis with ceramic femoral heads].
    Früh HJ; Kaddick C; Willmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Dec; 42(12):369-73. PubMed ID: 9487749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of prosthesis shaft coating on postoperative load bearing of the femur].
    Baroud G; Willmann G; Kreissig R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43(1-2):25-8. PubMed ID: 9542285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of porous coating and loading conditions on total hip femoral stem stability.
    Biegler FB; Reuben JD; Harrigan TP; Hou FJ; Akin JE
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Dec; 10(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 8749770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effective forces during walking on the human hip acetabulum].
    Witte H; Eckstein F; Recknagel S; Bernsmann K
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():428-9. PubMed ID: 9517222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Muscle performance about the knee joint in patients who had distal femoral replacement after resection of a bone tumor. An objective study with use of gait analysis.
    Benedetti MG; Catani F; Donati D; Simoncini L; Giannini S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Nov; 82(11):1619-25. PubMed ID: 11097453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biomechanics of the prosthetically managed femur--effect of prosthesis shaft coating].
    Baroud G; Willmann G; Kreissig R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():17-8. PubMed ID: 9517027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Levine DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):176-80. PubMed ID: 15057094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hip centralising forces of the iliotibial tract with various femoral neck angles].
    Birnbaum K; Pandorf T; Prescher A; Niethard FU; Weisskopf M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 19551586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Medium-term results of anatomic straight-shaft IMAGE implantation in primary hip joint endoprosthetics--a prospective study].
    Lorenz U; Forke L; Irlenbusch U
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 20563971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Reconstruction prosthesis after upper epiphyseal and diaphyseal resection of the femur for tumor. Results of 16 cases and a biomechanical study].
    Postel M; Langlais F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1977; 63(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 143011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proximal femoral implant preserves physiological bone deformation: a biomechanical investigation in cadaveric bones.
    Macdonald W; Carlsson LV; Jacobsson CM; Lee TQ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 12578218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.