These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9517137)

  • 1. [Dissipative image data reduction of digital coronary angiograms: comparison of image quality by an objective parameter].
    Bürgel U; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Meyer J
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():249-50. PubMed ID: 9517137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Foreshortened imaging: a new method for spatial interpretation and evaluating the view of the coronary region of interest].
    Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Morguet AJ; Arntz HR; Horstkotte D; Schultheiss HP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():366-7. PubMed ID: 9859401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital image processing.
    Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S73-82. PubMed ID: 9169105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First experience with monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from a 64-slice CT scanner with Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI).
    Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Fiechter M; Dougoud S; Gebhard C; Ghadri JR; Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23452997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-line quantitative coronary analysis in clinical practice: one step closer to reality?
    Ribichini F; Steffenino G; Dellavalle A; Mina P; Cerati R; Dalmasso M; Uslenghi E
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Feb; 31(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 8149420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer integrated radiology system: analogue goes digital.
    Sandmayr H; Wallentin D
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S90-3. PubMed ID: 9169108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts.
    Hammerstrom K; Aldrich J; Alves L; Ho A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 16710796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quantifying stenosis and evaluating projection--an online realization in the catheter laboratory].
    Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Morguet AJ; Arntz HR; Horstkotte D; Schultheiss HP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():364-5. PubMed ID: 9859400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concerns: Choosing a radiology workstation.
    Maes RM
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):335-6; author reply 335-6. PubMed ID: 18096552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial reconstruction of coronary arteries from biplane coronary angiograms.
    Guggenheim N; Doriot PA; Dorsaz PA; Descouts P; Rutishauser W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989; 34 Suppl():70-1. PubMed ID: 2819214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Expectations from digital imaging and archiving procedures].
    Ewen K; Kamm H; Richter D; St Stender H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 7548255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The new Siemens MagicView medical workstation for CT and MRI images].
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jul; 4(4):207. PubMed ID: 7918711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations.
    Hermiller JB; Cusma JT; Spero LA; Fortin DF; Harding MB; Bashore TM
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Feb; 25(2):110-31. PubMed ID: 1544153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional coronary angiography.
    Klein JL; Peifer JW; Garcia EV; Cooke CD; Folks R; Ezquerra N; King SB
    Am J Card Imaging; 1993 Sep; 7(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 10146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Densitometry quantification of coronary angiograms using coronary muscle calibration following elimination of scattering and distortion errors].
    Solzbach U; Waltenspiel R; Zeiher A; Wollschläger H; Just H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989; 34 Suppl():68-9. PubMed ID: 2819213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations.
    Krupinski EA; Kallergi M
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):671-82. PubMed ID: 17229874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT--the role of CT angiography.
    Dewey M
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 21273517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Development and current status of invasive coronary angiography].
    Pfeiler M
    Z Kardiol; 2000; 89 Suppl 1():3-10. PubMed ID: 10907293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.