These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9517922)
1. In vitro activities of cefminox against anaerobic bacteria compared with those of nine other compounds. Hoellman DB; Spangler SK; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1998 Mar; 42(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 9517922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Activity of WY-49605 compared with those of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, clindamycin, and metronidazole against 384 anaerobic bacteria. Spangler SK; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1994 Nov; 38(11):2599-604. PubMed ID: 7872754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, and other new beta-lactam agents against Bacteroides fragilis: contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Brown JE; Del Bene VE; Collins CD Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Feb; 19(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 6214986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro activities of 36 antimicrobial agents against clinically isolated Bacteroides fragilis. Teng LJ; Ho SW; Chang SC; Luh KT; Hsieh WC J Formos Med Assoc; 1991 Aug; 90(8):796-9. PubMed ID: 1683376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Susceptibilities of 428 gram-positive and -negative anaerobic bacteria to Bay y3118 compared with their susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, metronidazole, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoxitin. Pankuch GA; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1993 Aug; 37(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 8215278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparative in-vitro activity of cefotetan against anaerobic bacteria. Watt B; Brown FV J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Jun; 15(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 3861604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro activity of cefbuperazone compared with that of other new beta-lactam agents against anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance. Del Bene VE; Carek PJ; Twitty JA; Burkey LJ Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1985 May; 27(5):817-20. PubMed ID: 3874597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BMY28142, cefbuperazone (T-1982), and Sch 34343. Antimicrobial activity against 94 anaerobes compared to seven other antimicrobial agents. Jones RN; Barry AL; Packer RR Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1985 May; 3(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 3838925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefotetan, and clindamycin against cefoxitin-resistant strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Aldridge KE; Stratton CW J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Nov; 28(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 1778873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the in vitro inhibitory and bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and penicillin G against Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Comparison of time-kill kinetic studies with MIC values. Aldridge KE; Weeks LS; Stratton CW; Sanders CV Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 2076592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Susceptibilities of 394 Bacteroides fragilis, non-B. fragilis group Bacteroides species, and Fusobacterium species to newer antimicrobial agents. Appelbaum PC; Spangler SK; Jacobs MR Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Jun; 35(6):1214-8. PubMed ID: 1929264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antibacterial activity of the cephamycin cefotetan: an in-vitro comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics. Clarke AM; Zemcov SJ J Antimicrob Chemother; 1983 Jan; 11 Suppl():67-72. PubMed ID: 6404881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial activity, beta-lactamase stability and beta-lactamase inhibition of cefotetan and other 7-alpha-methoxy beta-lactam antimicrobials. Jones RN; Wilson HW Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1983 Mar; 1(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 6323095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of susceptibility results of the Bacteroides fragilis group and other anaerobes by traditional MIC results and statistical methods. Aldridge KE; Johnson WD J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Mar; 39(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 9096180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Susceptibility of 539 gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobes to new agents, including RP59500, biapenem, trospectomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Appelbaum PC; Spangler SK; Jacobs MR J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Aug; 32(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 8226424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro activity of MK0787 (N-formimidoyl thienamycin) and other beta-lactam compounds against Bacteroides spp. Nasu M; Maskell JP; Williams RJ; Williams JD Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Oct; 20(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 6282191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group to 10 antibiotics. Results of 4 laboratories in Austria]. Mittermayer H; Rotter M; Riezinger F; Thiel W; Stanek G Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1986 Nov; 262(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 3799095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Activity of telithromycin (HMR 3647) against anaerobic bacteria compared to those of eight other agents by time-kill methodology. Credito KL; Ednie LM; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1999 Aug; 43(8):2027-31. PubMed ID: 10428930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in Japan. Watanabe K; Ueno K; Kato N; Muto Y; Bandoh K; Tanaka Y; Jotwani R; Goto M; Shimada K; Shimizu K Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Nov; 11(11):1069-73. PubMed ID: 1295761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria. Wexler HM; Finegold SM Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Apr; 32(4):601-4. PubMed ID: 3163908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]