215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9519024)
1. Legal implications of birth videos.
Eitel DR; Yankowitz J; Ely JW
J Fam Pract; 1998 Mar; 46(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 9519024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk management tips for video technology.
Pickering AM
J Healthc Risk Manag; 1995; 15(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 10172205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [What are the medico-legal implications of induced labor?].
Pierre F; Bardin-Bedu C; Fabre H; Gombau HN; Soutoul JH
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(1 Suppl):120-8. PubMed ID: 8550970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Legal aspects in obstetric medicine].
Schlund GH
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2003 Oct; 125(10):404-8. PubMed ID: 14628222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should videotaping be restricted during labor and birth? Pro.
Reichert K
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2001; 26(2):62. PubMed ID: 11265436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should cameras be allowed in the delivery room?
Cesario SK
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1998; 23(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 9529871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. ACOG committee opinion. Liability implications of recording procedures or treatments. Number 207, September 1998. Committee on Professional Liability. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):95. PubMed ID: 10190682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
Cyran W
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Obstetric litigation is asphyxiating our maternity services.
Hankins GD; MacLennan AH; Speer ME; Strunk A; Nelson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1382-5. PubMed ID: 16738167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Medico-legal controversies in obstetrics and gynecology: an important current problem].
Tropea PF
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Sep; 47(9):401-7. PubMed ID: 8545042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical legal issues in obstetric ultrasound.
Chervenak FA; Chervenak JL
Clin Perinatol; 2007 Jun; 34(2):299-308, vi. PubMed ID: 17572236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent issues throughout the birthing process.
Woolery W
J Leg Med; 2000 Jun; 21(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 10911697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore.
Feld AD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):977-80. PubMed ID: 15180712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims.
Rosenblatt RA; Hurst A
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):710-4. PubMed ID: 2812646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cameras in the OR: educational asset or legal liability?
Motluk A
CMAJ; 2019 Sep; 191(36):E1012-E1013. PubMed ID: 31501188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative birth practices and settings--indications of prevalence and use among California obstetricians.
Purdy RJ; Lasnover AL; Harer WB
West J Med; 1986 Jul; 145(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 3751025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system.
Uesugi N; Yamanaka M; Suzuki T; Hirahara F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Aug; 36(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 20666935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding malpractice claims for lack of informed consent.
Hirsh BD
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10119379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
