These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9519702)

  • 1. Prospective remembering: perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?
    McDaniel MA; Robinson-Riegler B; Einstein GO
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jan; 26(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 9519702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: differential influence of attentional resources.
    McGann D; Ellis JA; Milne A
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1021-32. PubMed ID: 12507367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ageing affects conceptual but not perceptual memory processes.
    Stuart GP; Patel J; Bhagrath N
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 16574590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):512-25. PubMed ID: 10355240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remembering to remember: adult age differences in prospective memory.
    Mäntylä T
    J Gerontol; 1994 Nov; 49(6):P276-82. PubMed ID: 7963283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.
    Smith RE; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):756-77. PubMed ID: 15238021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object activation in semantic memory from visual multimodal feature input.
    Kraut MA; Kremen S; Moo LR; Segal JB; Calhoun V; Hart J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jan; 14(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 11798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Divided attention and indirect memory tests.
    Mulligan NW; Hartman M
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 8757494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic and episodic memory in aphasia.
    Barba GD; Frasson E; Mantovan MC; Gallo A; Denes G
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 May; 34(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 9148192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.
    Kormi-Nouri R; Shojaei RS; Moniri S; Gholami AR; Moradi AR; Akbari-Zardkhaneh S; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Apr; 49(2):93-109. PubMed ID: 18352979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERPs to encoding and recognition in two different inter-item association tasks.
    Weyerts H; Tendolkar I; Smid HG; Heinze HJ
    Neuroreport; 1997 May; 8(7):1583-8. PubMed ID: 9189896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related effects on perceptual and semantic encoding in memory.
    Kuo MC; Liu KP; Ting KH; Chan CC
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 261():95-106. PubMed ID: 24374080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced effects of pictorial distinctiveness on false memory following dynamic visual noise.
    Parker A; Kember T; Dagnall N
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):845-855. PubMed ID: 27637835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
    Guo C; Duan L; Li W; Paller KA
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Framing memories: How the retrieval query format shapes the neural bases of remembering.
    Raposo A; Frade S; Alves M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():309-319. PubMed ID: 27373768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.
    McDaniel MA; Guynn MJ; Einstein GO; Breneiser J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 15099129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory.
    McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
    Memory; 1993 Mar; 1(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 7584257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.