These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9520057)

  • 1. Direct cochlear nerve monitoring: first report on a new atraumatic, self-retaining electrode.
    Cueva RA; Morris GF; Prioleau GR
    Am J Otol; 1998 Mar; 19(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 9520057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Intraoperative monitoring of hearing function in the removal of cerebellopontine angle tumor: auditory brainstem response and cochlear nerve compound action potential].
    Yamakami I; Ushikubo O; Uchino Y; Kobayashi E; Saeki N; Yamaura A; Oka N
    No Shinkei Geka; 2002 Mar; 30(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 11905020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bipolar recording of the cochlear nerve action potentials during cerebellopontine angle surgery.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 8572095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical management of jugular foramen schwannomas with hearing and facial nerve function preservation: a series of 23 cases and review of the literature.
    Sanna M; Bacciu A; Falcioni M; Taibah A
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Dec; 116(12):2191-204. PubMed ID: 17146395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear nerve action potentials during cerebellopontine angle surgery: relationship of latency, amplitude, and threshold measurements to hearing.
    Stanton SG; Cashman MZ; Harrison RV; Nedzelski JM; Rowed DW
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 2785941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcochlear approach to cerebellopontine angle and clivus lesions: indications, results, and complications.
    De la Cruz A; Teufert KB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 19318889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do facial nerve displacement pattern and tumor adhesion influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery?
    Esquia-Medina GN; Grayeli AB; Ferrary E; Tubach F; Bernat I; Zhang Z; Bianchi C; Kalamarides M; Sterkers O
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 19318891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Functional assessment of cochlear nerve and hearing].
    Perrot X; Fischer C
    Neurochirurgie; 2009 Apr; 55(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 19298983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel method in predicting immediate postoperative facial nerve function post acoustic neuroma excision.
    Lin VY; Houlden D; Bethune A; Nolan M; Pirouzmand F; Rowed D; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17006353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microsurgical results with large vestibular schwannomas with preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function as the primary aim.
    Raftopoulos C; Abu Serieh B; Duprez T; Docquier MA; Guérit JM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2005 Jul; 147(7):697-706; discussion 706. PubMed ID: 15900399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct cochlear nerve action potentials as an aid to hearing preservation in middle fossa acoustic neuroma resection.
    Roberson J; Senne A; Brackmann D; Hitselberger WE; Saunders J
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):653-7. PubMed ID: 8841717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing preservation in neurofibromatosis type 2.
    Slattery WH; Brackmann DE; Hitselberger W
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 9752973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?
    James ML; Husain AM
    Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(10):1551-5. PubMed ID: 16301480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile dysgeusia: a new clinical observation of middle ear and skull base surgery.
    Chen JM; Bodmer D; Khetani JD; Lin VV
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 17989578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of facial nerve monitoring systems in cerebellopontine angle surgery.
    Dickins JR; Graham SS
    Am J Otol; 1991 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2012182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intraoperative monitoring auditory function during surgery of internal auditory canal and C-P angle].
    Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(3):141-3, 189-90. PubMed ID: 1419190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vestibular schwannomas and auditory function: options in large T3 and T4 tumors?
    Matthies C; Samii M
    Neurochirurgie; 2002 Dec; 48(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 12595801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function: experimental observations and new applications.
    Wazen JJ
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Apr; 104(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 8164484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The identification and functional tracking of the facial nerve during the removal of tumors of the cerebellopontine angle].
    Shchekut'ev GA; Konovalov AN; Luk'ianov VI; Kolokol'nikov AE
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 1998; (3):19-24. PubMed ID: 9854782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.