These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9520314)

  • 1. On the reliability and validity of noninvasive laterality measures.
    Voyer D
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Mar; 36(2):209-36. PubMed ID: 9520314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and magnitude of auditory laterality effects: the influence of attention.
    Voyer D; Flight JI
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 11487289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships among multiple task asymmetries. II. A large-sample factor analysis.
    Boles DB
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Apr; 36(3):268-89. PubMed ID: 9647679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The force of symmetry revisited: symmetry-to-noise ratios regulate (a)symmetry effects.
    Csathó A; van der Vloed G; van der Helm PA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 15500805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fractional anisotropy correlates with auditory simple reaction time performance.
    Böhr S; Güllmar D; Knab R; Reichenbach JR; Witte OW; Haueisen J
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():194-202. PubMed ID: 17996226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT) population of men.
    Kurtze N; Rangul V; Hustvedt BE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Oct; 8():63. PubMed ID: 18844976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors.
    Yovel G; Levy J; Yovel I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1369-85. PubMed ID: 11766931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free-viewing laterality tasks: a multilevel meta-analysis.
    Voyer D; Voyer SD; Tramonte L
    Neuropsychology; 2012 Sep; 26(5):551-67. PubMed ID: 22731609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jan; 80(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 11817889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of perceptual asymmetry for free viewing of chimeric stimuli.
    Chiang CH; Ballantyne AO; Trauner DA
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 11104534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Systemic organization of perceptive activity in children with different levels of mental development].
    Fishman MN
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(6):67-73. PubMed ID: 14730935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closing the mind's eye: deactivation of visual cortex related to auditory task difficulty.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Casanova R; Hayasaka S; Kraft R; Maldjian JA; Burdette JH
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 18185099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging f(MRI) tasks that may replace the gold standard, Wada testing, for language lateralization while giving additional localization information.
    Brockway JP
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):57-9. PubMed ID: 10857663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of viewing speech on auditory speech processing is different in the left and right hemispheres.
    Davis C; Kislyuk D; Kim J; Sams M
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():151-61. PubMed ID: 18538750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Features of the brain functional organization in right- and left-handed 6-7 years old children during visuospatial performance of different complexity. Part II. Analysis of EEG parameters during visuospatial performance of high level complexity].
    Bezrukikh MM; Khrianin AV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2004; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 15040286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Möttönen R; Schürmann M; Sams M
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Jun; 363(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 15172096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
    Nelson DE; Holtzman D; Bolen J; Stanwyck CA; Mack KA
    Soz Praventivmed; 2001; 46 Suppl 1():S3-42. PubMed ID: 11851091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia.
    Huang HC; Wang TY
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):539-45. PubMed ID: 19363196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual word-form processing: progress, conflict, and evaluating theories.
    Marsolek CJ; Deason RG
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):304-7; author reply 308-12. PubMed ID: 17418887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.