These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9520626)

  • 1. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.
    Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target detection performance in helmet-mounted and conventional dome displays.
    Hettinger LJ; Nelson WT; Haas MW
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(4):321-34. PubMed ID: 11540400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance.
    Tlauka M
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 14668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of background scene complexity and field dependence on the legibility of head-up displays for automotive applications.
    Ward NJ; Parkes A; Crone PR
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):735-45. PubMed ID: 8851776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian networks and information theory for audio-visual perception modeling.
    Besson P; Richiardi J; Bourdin C; Bringoux L; Mestre DR; Vercher JL
    Biol Cybern; 2010 Sep; 103(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 20502912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relation between field dependency, visual search and structure of displays.
    Bone K
    Ergonomics; 1978 May; 21(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 668677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and scanning of imagined and perceived visual images.
    Brown HD; Kosslyn SM; Dror IE
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 9555570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between two spatially separated letters presented in succession.
    Grabowska A; Budohoska W
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1979; 39(3):109-19. PubMed ID: 543458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short term memory for tactile stimuli.
    Gallace A; Tan HZ; Haggard P; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():132-42. PubMed ID: 18083147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuoperceptual deficits in letter-by-letter reading?
    Mycroft RH; Behrmann M; Kay J
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1733-44. PubMed ID: 19397869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Cogn Psychol; 1996 Dec; 31(3):248-306. PubMed ID: 8975684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.