These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9520767)
21. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations. Qin M; Liu H Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results. Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with a polyethylene fibre-reinforced composite. Ayna B; Celenk S; Atakul F; Uysal E Aust Dent J; 2009 Jun; 54(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19473155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results. Demirci M; Ersev H; Topçubaşi M; Uçok M Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. One-year clinical evaluation of an anterior composite resin. Saleh N; Peretz B; Rehany Al; Zyskind D; Hirschfeld Z; Stark M Quintessence Int; 1992 Aug; 23(8):559-67. PubMed ID: 1410261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Sarrett DC Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Clinical evaluation for wear of composite resin in filling of molars]. Ji A; Lin H; Wang J Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 32(6):335-7. PubMed ID: 11189303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report. el-Mowafy O J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities. Demirci M; Uçok M Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 12537341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing. Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]