These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9522687)

  • 21. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Relation of surface texture of fine finishing diamond point for composite resin and polished surface of composite resin].
    Matsumoto A; Yamauchi M; Yamamoto K; Sakai M; Noda S; Yamaguchi S; Kawano J; Kimura K
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 May; 8(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 2637504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 15195727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cleaning and polishing efficacy of abrasive-bristle brushes and a prophylaxis paste on resin composite material in vitro.
    Schmidlin PR; Sener B; Lutz F
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Oct; 33(9):691-9. PubMed ID: 12666895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface roughness of three resin restorative materials after finishing and polishing.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Contardo L; Chiesa R; Di Lenarda R; Dorigo E
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Apr; 55(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 16618992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is surface roughness of resin composites affected by operator's performance?
    Jung M; Otte A; Klimek J
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 18435367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
    Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Gunnin TD
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):189-91. PubMed ID: 9590906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of lubrication on the temperature rise and surface finish of amalgam and composite resin.
    Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16781042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time.
    Park SH; Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 10842135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins.
    Joniot SB; Grégoire GL; Auther AM; Roques YM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 11203836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time.
    Yap AU; Ong SB; Yap WY; Tan WS; Yeo JC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 12216564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of different finishing methods for composites and compomers. Profilometric analysis].
    Rapisarda E; Bonaccorso A; Tripi TR; Torrisi L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 May; 48(5):181-9. PubMed ID: 10434535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.