These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Wucher M; Grobler SR; Senekal PJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants. de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children. Mass E; Gordon M; Fuks AB ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study. Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results. Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth. Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. van Dijken JW Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation. Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. García-Godoy F Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]