These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9522758)

  • 21. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tensile strength and microleakage of the bond between a nickel-chromium alloy and a visible light-cured resin composite: effect of 4-META, silicoating, and bead retention.
    Tulunoğlu IF; Oktemer M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jul; 28(7):447-51. PubMed ID: 9477893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of different adhesive systems on microleakage at the amalgam/composite resin interface.
    Hadavi F; Hey JH; Ambrose ER; Elbadrawy HE
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 8332537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB; Neme AM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Experimental use of dentin bonding agents and a cavity varnish to reduce marginal microleakage in high copper amalgam restorations].
    Aras S; Cetiner S
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2700122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond-strength study.
    Harari D; Aunni E; Gillis I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10982932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners.
    Tjan AH; Tan DE; Sun JC; Tjan AH
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 9590917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observation of an amalgam-bonded tooth through a scanning electron microscope.
    Orosa JL
    N Y State Dent J; 2003; 69(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 13677864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.