These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9522758)

  • 41. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Amalgam Restorations: To Bond or Not.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2015; 94(5):35-7. PubMed ID: 26596104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microleakage of adhesively bonded cervical amalgam restorations.
    Briso AL; Campos IT; Sundfeld RH; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 12469755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Addition of fresh amalgam to existing amalgam utilizing various adhesive liners: a SEM study.
    Leelawat C; Scherer W; Chang J; David S; Schulman A
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Microleakage of four different amalgam binding systems].
    Oberholzer TG; Grobler SR; Rossouw RJ; van Wyk Kotze TJ; Grobler-Rabie A
    SADJ; 2001 Feb; 56(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16894691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system.
    Mandras RS; Thurmond JW; Latta MA; Matranga LF; Kildee JM; Barkmeier WW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 9610324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects.
    Roberts HW; Charlton DG; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 11357570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shear bond strength, microleakage, and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents.
    Grobler SR; Oberholzer TG; Rossouw RJ; Grobler-Rabie A; Van Wyk Kotze TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 11203971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Coury TL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ziskind D; Venezia E; Kreisman I; Mass E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12942059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.