These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clinical trials, outcomes, and statistics: how better can be worse. Riggs JE; Hobbs GR Neurology; 1998 Oct; 51(4):1234-5. PubMed ID: 9781583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measuring errors in neonatal randomized controlled trials. Deficient quality concerning the informed consent]. Finnström O Lakartidningen; 2001 May; 98(20):2474-5. PubMed ID: 11433980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite outcomes can distort the nature and magnitude of treatment benefits in clinical trials. Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Permanyer-Miralda G; Busse JW; Devereaux PJ; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P; Montori VM Ann Intern Med; 2009 Apr; 150(8):566-7. PubMed ID: 19380859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Korn and Freidlin's misunderstanding of the null hypothesis significance testing procedure. Trafimow D; Rice S Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 21400377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between bibliometric parameters, reporting and methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in vascular and endovascular surgery. Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Antoniou GA; Green PA; Maden M; Torella F Vascular; 2017 Apr; 25(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 27252347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enriched enrolment with randomised withdrawal (EERW): Time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain. McQuay HJ; Derry S; Moore AR; Poulain P; Legout V Pain; 2008 Apr; 135(3):217-220. PubMed ID: 18258369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Timeline cluster: a graphical tool to identify risk of bias in cluster randomised trials. Caille A; Kerry S; Tavernier E; Leyrat C; Eldridge S; Giraudeau B BMJ; 2016 Aug; 354():i4291. PubMed ID: 27530617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of the quality of statistical methods employed for analysing quality of life data in cancer randomised controlled trials. Hamel JF; Saulnier P; Pe M; Zikos E; Musoro J; Coens C; Bottomley A Eur J Cancer; 2017 Sep; 83():166-176. PubMed ID: 28738257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to perform a critical analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Estellat C; Torgerson DJ; Ravaud P Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 19393572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues in the planning and conduct of randomised trials. Bhandari M; Pape HC; Giannoudis PV Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16487524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are we doing enough to ensure quality of trials? Tugwell P; Knottnerus A; Idzerda L J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 23347847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part II. Whitney JD J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Nov; 27(6):293-5. PubMed ID: 11096408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Primary Outcome Is Positive - Is That Good Enough? Pocock SJ; Stone GW N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(10):971-9. PubMed ID: 27602669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study. Sanders C; Egger M; Donovan J; Tallon D; Frankel S BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1191-4. PubMed ID: 9794853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical trials--multiple treatments, multiple end points, and multiple lessons. Lauer MS; Topol EJ JAMA; 2003 May; 289(19):2575-7. PubMed ID: 12759328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: A randomized study of back school in women with chronic low back pain. Quality of life at three, six, and twelve months follow-up. Padua R; Bondi R; Ceccarelli E; Alviti F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1336. PubMed ID: 19455011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]