These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9524489)

  • 1. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique.
    Banton B; Henry MD
    J Dent Technol; 1997 Sep; 14(7):14-20. PubMed ID: 9524489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ERA implant-supported overdenture.
    Davidoff SR; Davis RP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 May; 16(5):512, 514, 516 passim; quiz 522. PubMed ID: 8624990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
    Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory processing of housing-retained attachments for implant-supported overdentures.
    Choy E; Reimer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):516-8. PubMed ID: 11357081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of a failed mandibular staple implant: a clinical report.
    Ettinger RL; Fakhry A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 21095398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques for incorporation of attachments in implant-retained overdentures with unsplinted abutments.
    Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Lee C; Ortegon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):288-99. PubMed ID: 22546306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a simplified, cost-effective treatment approach.
    Shifman A; Marshak B
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Dec; 25(12):825-8. PubMed ID: 7568690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.