BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9524498)

  • 1. Practitioner-patient communication software: an aid in the prescription of dental prostheses.
    Lavigne J; Lund JP; Feine JS
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):220-4. PubMed ID: 9524498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment.
    Levi A; Psoter WJ; Agar JR; Reisine ST; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 12608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the prosthodontic patient. An investigation of factors influencing patient expectations and satisfaction with extensive prosthodontic care.
    Hakestam U
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1998; 128():1-53. PubMed ID: 9646396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentist-patient communication and patient satisfaction in prosthetic dentistry.
    Sondell K; Söderfeldt B; Palmqvist S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11887596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communication during prosthodontic treatment--dentist, patient, and dental nurse.
    Sondell K; Söderfeldt B; Palmqvist S; Adell A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11203677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment planning the single-implant restoration: interdisciplinary coordination.
    Lum MG; Shah KC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Nov; 36(11):837-48. PubMed ID: 19090071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
    Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Martí E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilitation of cancer patients: treatment concept and proposed criteria for success.
    Weischer T; Mohr C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 10453667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictable patient communication using trial porcelain veneers.
    Adar C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 14(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 12004633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbal communication in prosthetic dentistry. Input-process-outcome.
    Sondell K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (146):1-113. PubMed ID: 11433683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rx for caries prevention: time line for home care. A software aid for communication of patient instructions for management of dental caries.
    Newitter DA; Meiers JC; Kazemi RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 11931140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies.
    Strassburger C; Kerschbaum T; Heydecke G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 16900816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists.
    Chang M; Odman PA; Wennström JL; Andersson B
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 10635203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surfing on software. The patient consultation: a comparison of traditional and computer-based methods.
    Eckler M
    Ont Dent; 1998 May; 75(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 9800574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentist communication with the dental laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants.
    Afsharzand Z; Rashedi B; Petropoulos VC
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 16681504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using standardized patients to assess presentation of a dental treatment plan.
    Logan HL; Muller PJ; Edwards Y; Jakobsen JR
    J Dent Educ; 1999 Oct; 63(10):729-37. PubMed ID: 10572538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient evaluation of treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants or a combination of teeth and implants.
    Kronström M; Trulsson M; Söderfeldt B
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15345015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dentist's communicative role in prosthodontic treatment.
    Sondell K; Palmqvist S; Söderfeldt B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 15686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
    Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.