386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9525238)
1. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The bone-anchored hearing aid in patients with a unilateral air-bone gap.
Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Jan; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 11773849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are two ears not better than one?
McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unilateral and bilateral hearing aids, spatial release from masking and auditory acclimatization.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):596-606. PubMed ID: 23862834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients?
McNeil ML; Gulliver M; Morris DP; Makki FM; Bance M
J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Jan; 128(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24330750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients.
Iwaki T; Matsushiro N; Mah SR; Sato T; Yasuoka E; Yamamoto K; Kubo T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15224853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
