These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9525517)

  • 1. Measurement of facial movement with computer software.
    Sargent EW; Fadhli OA; Cohen RS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Mar; 124(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 9525517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a universal, automated facial measurement tool in facial reanimation.
    Hadlock TA; Urban LS
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 22508895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphic-visual adaptation of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading for peripheral facial palsy.
    Lazarini P; Mitre E; Takatu E; Tidei R
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 31(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 16759238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading global score in the setting of differential facial nerve function.
    Yen TL; Driscoll CL; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 12544040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the "Sydney," "Sunnybrook," and "House Brackmann" facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis.
    Coulson SE; Croxson GR; Adams RD; O'Dwyer NJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15806042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Glasgow Facial Palsy Scale for the assessment of smile reanimation surgery in facial paralysis.
    Romeo M; O'Reilly B; Robertson BF; Morley S
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 37(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 22540420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative analysis of facial motion components: anatomic and nonanatomic motion in normal persons and in patients with complete facial paralysis.
    Bajaj-Luthra A; Mueller T; Johnson PC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):1894-902; discussion 1903-4. PubMed ID: 9180713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Measuring facial paralysis using the three-dimensional dynamic quantitative analysis system of facial motion: correlation with subjective grading systems].
    Zhao Y; Feng GD; Wu HY; Zhuang Y; Gao ZQ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 27480299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed.
    de Ru JA; Braunius WW; van Benthem PP; Busschers WB; Hordijk GJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):1030-6. PubMed ID: 17006355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of the Adour-Swanson and House-Brackmann grading systems for facial nerve recovery.
    Lewis BI; Adour KK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1995; 252(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 7576582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face.
    Neely JG; Cheung JY; Wood M; Byers J; Rogerson A
    Am J Otol; 1992 Mar; 13(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 1599013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Videomimicography: a new objective evaluation of facial motor function].
    Wang DS; Dulguerov P; Lehmann W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15127569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction.
    Linstrom CJ
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jul; 112(7 Pt 1):1129-47. PubMed ID: 12169889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative analysis of facial palsy using a three-dimensional facial motion measurement system.
    Katsumi S; Esaki S; Hattori K; Yamano K; Umezaki T; Murakami S
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Aug; 42(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 25655983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. I. Vector of displacement.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ; Silvester KT; Greenlee GM; Johnston LE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Mar; 35(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 9527310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial motor function monitored by hand held calipers versus computer-assisted photography.
    Clapham L; Bottoms S; Mehta R; Davis A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Dec; 148(12):1281-7; discussion 1287. PubMed ID: 17091210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis for evaluation of facial movement.
    Hontanilla B; Aubá C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 17569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional quantification of "still" points during normal facial movement.
    Coulson SE; Croxson GR; Gilleard WL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1999 Mar; 108(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 10086619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram.
    O'Reilly BF; Soraghan JJ; McGrenary S; He S
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 20042993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing impairment and disability of facial paralysis in patients with vestibular schwannoma.
    Lee J; Fung K; Lownie SP; Parnes LS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jan; 133(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 17224525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.