These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9526169)

  • 1. Extreme selection strategies in gene mapping studies of oligogenic quantitative traits do not always increase power.
    Allison DB; Heo M; Schork NJ; Wong SL; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 1998; 48(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 9526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample sizes for linkage with extreme sampling under an oligogenic model for quantitative traits.
    Heo M; Faith MS; Allison DB
    Behav Genet; 2002 Jan; 32(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 11958540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
    Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel linkage mapping approach using DNA pooling in human and animal genetics. II. Detection of quantitative traits loci in dairy cattle.
    Pareek CS; Pareek RS; Walawski K
    J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 12177520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study concerning the effect of varying the residual phenotypic correlation on the power of bivariate quantitative trait loci linkage analysis.
    Evans DM; Duffy DL
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 14755178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multipoint oligogenic linkage analysis of quantitative traits.
    Blangero J; Almasy L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):959-64. PubMed ID: 9433607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalence of three score tests for association mapping of quantitative trait loci under selective genotyping.
    Tang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 34(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 20552655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fine mapping quantitative trait loci under selective phenotyping strategies based on linkage and linkage disequilibrium criteria.
    Ansari-Mahyari S; Berg P; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Dec; 126(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 19912418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential quantitative trait locus mapping in experimental crosses.
    Satagopan JM; Sen S; Churchill GA
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article12. PubMed ID: 17474878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping.
    Eaves L; Meyer J
    Behav Genet; 1994 Sep; 24(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 7993321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel sib pair selection strategy increases power in quantitative association analysis.
    Kwan JS; Cherny SS; Kung AW; Sham PC
    Behav Genet; 2009 Sep; 39(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 19568925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping quantitative-trait loci in humans by use of extreme concordant sib pairs: selected sampling by parental phenotypes.
    Zhang H; Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 8808613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 1998 May; 28(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 9670595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.
    Purcell S; Cherny SS; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensemble Learning of QTL Models Improves Prediction of Complex Traits.
    Bian Y; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Aug; 5(10):2073-84. PubMed ID: 26276383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linkage analysis of a common oligogenic disease using selected sib pairs.
    Cardon LR; Fulker DW; Cherny SS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 8788002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effective sib-pair designs in the mapping of quantitative-trait loci.
    Zhao H; Zhang H; Rotter JI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 May; 60(5):1211-21. PubMed ID: 9150169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.