111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9526215)
1. An in vitro study of a new design of acetabular cement pressurizer.
Bernoski FP; New AM; Scott RA; Northmore-Ball MD
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Feb; 13(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 9526215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo measurement of acetabular cement pressurization using a simple new design of cement pressurizer.
New AM; Northmore-Ball MD; Tanner KE; Cheah SK
J Arthroplasty; 1999 Oct; 14(7):854-9. PubMed ID: 10537262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers.
Parsch D; Diehm C; New AM; Schneider S; Breusch SJ
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 15067656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved acetabular pressurization gives better cement penetration: in vivo measurements during total hip arthroplasty.
Flivik G; Wulff K; Sanfridsson J; Ryd L
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Oct; 19(7):911-8. PubMed ID: 15483809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the Rim Cutter on cement pressurization and penetration on cemented acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty: an in vitro study.
Smith BN; Lee AJ; Timperley AJ; Whitehouse SL; Crawford RW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(9):1133-40. PubMed ID: 21053777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation.
Boote AT; Deehan DJ; Rankin KS; Swailes DC; Hyde PJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Oct; 110(10):2290-2298. PubMed ID: 35657060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of initial pressurization and cup introduction time on the depth of cement penetration in an acetabular model.
Abdulghani S; Wang JS; McCarthy I; Flivik G
Acta Orthop; 2007 Jun; 78(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 17611845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement pressurisation in the acetabulum.
Wadia F; Malik MH; Leonard D; Porter ML
Int Orthop; 2006 Aug; 30(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 16639594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cement pressurisation in flanged and unflanged acetabular cups.
Bhattacharya R; Attar FG; Green S; Port A
J Orthop Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 7():5. PubMed ID: 22305294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of acetabular cup temperature and duration of cement pressurization on cement porosity in a canine total hip replacement model.
Shields SL; Schulz KS; Hagan CE; Kass P
Vet Surg; 2002; 31(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 11884962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressurization of bone cement under standard, flanged and custom acetabular components for total hip replacement.
Beverland DE; Kernohan WG; Nixon JR; Orr JF; Watson P
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1993; 207(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8363694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits of using modern cementing techniques in the acetabulum: the Rim Cutter.
Darmanis SN; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2012 Dec; 20(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 23255637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral cement pressurization in hip arthroplasty: a laboratory comparison of three techniques.
Kapoor B; Datir SP; Davis B; Wynn-Jones CH; Maffulli N
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 15762260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of a "rim cutter" device and a flanged cup for improving the mantle of the acetabular component of a cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty.
Fernández-Valencia JÁ; Gallart X; Bori G; Rodríguez-Roiz JM; Combalia A
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Dec; 26(8):891-894. PubMed ID: 27549660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments.
Parsch D; Diehm C; Schneider S; New A; Breusch SJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Jun; 75(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 15260418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flanged and unflanged acetabular cup design. An experimental study using ceramic and cadaveric acetabuli.
Ørskov M; Abdulghani S; McCarthy I; Søballe K; Flivik G
Acta Orthop; 2010 Oct; 81(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 20860522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical considerations of cemented acetabular components: a 30-year evaluation.
Crites BM; Berend ME; Ritter MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Dec; (381):114-9. PubMed ID: 11127647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro pressurization of the acetabular cement mantle: the effect of a flange.
Lankester BJ; Sabri O; Gheduzzi S; Stoney JD; Miles AW; Bannister GC
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 17689785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
