These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9527311)

  • 1. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. II. Interlandmark separation.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Mar; 35(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 9527311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. I. Vector of displacement.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ; Silvester KT; Greenlee GM; Johnston LE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Mar; 35(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 9527310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of facial soft tissue mobility in man.
    Trotman CA; Stohler CS; Johnston LE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 9482219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion.
    Gross MM; Trotman CA; Moffatt KS
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 8805913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling facial movement: II. A dynamic analysis of differences caused by orthognathic surgery.
    Nooreyazdan M; Trotman CA; Faraway JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 62(11):1380-6. PubMed ID: 15510359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part II: Quantification of nasolabial movement.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ; Losken HW; van Aalst JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Nov; 44(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 18177193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implications for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery.
    Gosain AK; Amarante MT; Hyde JS; Yousif NJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Sep; 98(4):622-36. PubMed ID: 8773684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomy of emotion: a 3D study of facial mimicry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Eur J Histochem; 2007; 51 Suppl 1():45-52. PubMed ID: 17703593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influence of sex and facial shape.
    Weeden JC; Trotman CA; Faraway JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 11302590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of age and sex on facial mimicry: a three-dimensional study in healthy adults.
    Sforza C; Mapelli A; Galante D; Moriconi S; Ibba TM; Ferraro L; Ferrario VF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(10):990-9. PubMed ID: 20598508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of a three-dimensional method for measuring facial animation: a case report.
    Trotman CA; Gross MM; Moffatt K
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 8805914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic analysis of a Duchenne smile.
    Jaffer H; Ichesco E; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2016 Apr; 64():11-8. PubMed ID: 26741999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gender and age differences in facial expressions.
    Houstis O; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19541798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring 3D facial displacement of increasing smile expressions.
    Fishman Z; Kiss A; Zuker RM; Fialkov JA; Whyne CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4273-4280. PubMed ID: 36171175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of the reproducibility of non-verbal facial expressions in normal persons using dynamic stereophotogrammetric system].
    Qiu TC; Liu XJ; Xue ZL; Li ZL
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 52(6):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 33331322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling facial movement: I. A dynamic analysis of differences based on skeletal characteristics.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 62(11):1372-9. PubMed ID: 15510358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial movement before and after masseteric-facial nerves anastomosis: a three-dimensional optoelectronic pilot study.
    Sforza C; Frigerio A; Mapelli A; Mandelli F; Sidequersky FV; Colombo V; Ferrario VF; Biglioli F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 21872484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Videomimicography: the standards of normal revised.
    Dulguerov P; Wang D; Perneger TV; Marchal F; Lehmann W
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Sep; 129(9):960-5. PubMed ID: 12975268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical application of three-dimensional motion capture (4D): a novel approach to quantify the dynamics of facial animations.
    Shujaat S; Khambay BS; Ju X; Devine JC; McMahon JD; Wales C; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):907-16. PubMed ID: 24583138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.