These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9527533)

  • 1. Reports from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: update of application and standards for utilization.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(4):646-7. PubMed ID: 9527533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reports from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS). The cochlear implant in adults, adolescents, and children.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(4):642-5. PubMed ID: 9527532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reports from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS). The safety of dental amalgam: a state-of-the-art review.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(4):639-42. PubMed ID: 9489256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technology briefs from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS). Diathermy and balloon dialatation treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1993; 9(4):593-5. PubMed ID: 7507097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Report from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé (CETS). Mandate of the conseil.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1992; 8(2):366. PubMed ID: 1628918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reports from the Conseil d'évaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec. Hemodialyzer reuse: considerations of safety and cost.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):639-40. PubMed ID: 1778710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report from the Conseil D'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS). The costs of conventional cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and biliary lithotripsy.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1994; 10(4):713. PubMed ID: 7843893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Report from the Conseil d'Evaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec (CETS).
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(3):629-31. PubMed ID: 7591561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reuse of single-use cardiac catheters: safety, economical, ethical and legal issues. Conseil d'évaluation des technologies de la sante du Québec.
    Can J Cardiol; 1994 May; 10(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 8193985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reports from the Conseil d'evaluation des technologies de la santé du Quebec.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1994; 10(1):198-200. PubMed ID: 8157454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reports from the Conseil D'évaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec. Screening for breast cancer in Quebec: estimates of health effects and costs.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):638-9. PubMed ID: 1778709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomedical research in Quebec: the history of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec.
    Genest J
    CMAJ; 1996 Sep; 155(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 8823209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can our health services be saved by technology evaluation? The Quebec experience.
    McGregor M
    Clin Invest Med; 1994 Aug; 17(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 7982297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Three case reports].
    Silber S; Richartz BM; Brilmayer M;
    Herz; 2006 Dec; 31(9):836-46, 848. PubMed ID: 17180646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do the current ACC/AHA guidelines correctly reflect the attitudes and utilization of PCI in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis?
    Bottner RK; Klein LW;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Mar; 64(3):402-5. PubMed ID: 15736261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards of care: subjectivity and persuasion.
    Tung R
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2009; 10(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19367226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: two years' observational experience and follow-up.
    Ting HH; Garratt KN; Singh M; Kjelsberg MA; Timimi FK; Cragun KT; Houlihan RJ; Boutchee KL; Crocker CH; Cusma JT; Wood DL; Holmes DR
    Am Heart J; 2003 Feb; 145(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 12595845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolving algorithm concerning higher-risk PCI (TEACH-PCI). Introduction.
    Steinhubl SR
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2007; 8 Suppl 3():S1-2. PubMed ID: 17917616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes after multilesion percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between exclusive and selective use of drug-eluting stents.
    Bertrand OF; Faurie B; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Gleeton O; Déry JP; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; Costerousse O; De Larochellière R; Rodés-Cabau J
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 20(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 18316823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How long is too long?
    Webb J; Humphries K; Sutandar A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 13(10):673. PubMed ID: 11581507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.