These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9528411)

  • 21. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
    Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U; Rabie AB; Bendeus M; Wong RW; Wey MC; Du X; Peng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment effects of bonded RME and vertical-pull chincup followed by fixed appliance in patients with increased vertical dimension.
    Schulz SO; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 16168329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
    Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treatment of Class III malocclusion with the horseshoe appliance: case reports in growing patients.
    Yang KH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 22(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9643195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orthodontic compensation in skeletal Class III malocclusion: a case report.
    de Figueiredo MA; Siqueira DF; Bommarito S; Scanavini MA
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 18092524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of vertical chincap therapy on the mandibular morphology in open-bite patients.
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan A; Meral O; Taner-Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 12439479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Indication and effectiveness of the J-hook headgear].
    Miethke RR
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):267-84. PubMed ID: 2135590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance.
    Biren S; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Achieving excellence in TMJ, functional orthopedics, and orthodontic case finishing: Part IV (Section 2). Determinants of occlusion and vertical dimension.
    Broadbent JM
    Funct Orthod; 1994; 11(4):22-30. PubMed ID: 8613102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.