These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9529902)

  • 21. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.
    Miller J; Ulrich R; Lamarre Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 11414141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one.
    Woods DL; Alain C; Ogawa KH
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9529908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working memory capacity and visual-verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: toward a unified view of attention.
    Sörqvist P; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 24(11):2147-54. PubMed ID: 22849400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability-Weighted Integration of Audiovisual Signals Can Be Modulated by Top-down Attention.
    Rohe T; Noppeney U
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 29527567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention-dependent allocation of auditory processing resources as measured by mismatch negativity.
    Dittmann-Balcar A; Thienel R; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 1999 Dec; 10(18):3749-53. PubMed ID: 10716203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance.
    Manjarrez E; Mendez I; Martinez L; Flores A; Mirasso CR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17276601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender differences in pre-attentive change detection for visual but not auditory stimuli.
    Yang X; Yu Y; Chen L; Sun H; Qiao Z; Qiu X; Zhang C; Wang L; Zhu X; He J; Zhao L; Yang Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):431-441. PubMed ID: 26077633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A deafening flash! Visual interference of auditory signal detection.
    Fassnidge C; Cecconi Marcotti C; Freeman E
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():15-24. PubMed ID: 28092861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.
    Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory capture of visual motion: effects on perception and discrimination.
    McCourt ME; Leone LM
    Neuroreport; 2016 Sep; 27(14):1095-100. PubMed ID: 27513197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal integration of simple auditory and visual events.
    Patching GR; Quinlan PT
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jan; 66(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 15095946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neurophysiologic studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: comparison of auditory and visual responses.
    Adler LE; Waldo MC; Freedman R
    Biol Psychiatry; 1985 Dec; 20(12):1284-96. PubMed ID: 4063418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contributions of sensory dominance and attentional bias to cross-modal enhancement of visual cortex excitability.
    Romei V; Murray MM; Cappe C; Thut G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1122-35. PubMed ID: 23384192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visuo-perceptual capabilities predict sensitivity for coinciding auditory and visual transients in multi-element displays.
    Meyerhoff HS; Gehrer NA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183723. PubMed ID: 28902903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.