These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9529907)

  • 1. Attentional processing of "unattended" flankers: evidence for a failure of selective attention.
    Schmidt PA; Dark VJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 9529907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flanker recall and the flanker validity effect may reflect different attentional processes.
    Schmidt PA; Dark VJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Apr; 61(3):424-37. PubMed ID: 10334091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.
    Paquet L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 11495118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis.
    Mueller CJ; Kuchinke L
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):963-973. PubMed ID: 26253324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers.
    Freeman E; Sagi D; Driver J
    Nat Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 4(10):1032-6. PubMed ID: 11559851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the attention shift hypothesis as an account for the flanker sequence-based congruency modulation in spatial flanker tasks.
    Zeischka P; Deroost N; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 20923086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception.
    Palermo R; Rhodes G
    Cognition; 2002 Jan; 82(3):225-57. PubMed ID: 11747863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primes and flankers: source confusions and discounting.
    Denton SE; Shiffrin RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 22528611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlational cuing as a function of target complexity and target-flanker similarity.
    Cohen A; Fuchs A; Bar-Sela A; Brumberg Y; Magen H
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):275-90. PubMed ID: 10089761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.
    Paquet L; Lortie C
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 2243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: an early-selection account of selective attention failures.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Jung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1257-73. PubMed ID: 24730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias.
    Snell J; Grainger J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1512-1519. PubMed ID: 29858975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently.
    Grainger J; Tydgat I; Isselé J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):673-88. PubMed ID: 20515197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When  configural  cues  eliminate the polarity advantage.
    Rummens K; Sayim B
    J Vis; 2022 May; 22(6):2. PubMed ID: 35503508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.