These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9529908)

  • 1. Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one.
    Woods DL; Alain C; Ogawa KH
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9529908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How serial is serial processing in vision?
    Zohary E; Hochstein S
    Perception; 1989; 18(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 2771604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks.
    Wolfe JM; Friedman-Hill SR; Bilsky AB
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 8008555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual search at different spatial scales.
    Saarinen J
    Scand J Psychol; 1995 Mar; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 7725072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel.
    Mordkoff JT; Yantis S; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 2385490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.
    McElree B; Carrasco M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1517-39. PubMed ID: 10641310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional selection of objects or features: evidence from a modified search task.
    Mounts JR; Melara RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):322-41. PubMed ID: 10089764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets.
    Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):775-97. PubMed ID: 8409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irrelevant auditory attention shifts prime corresponding responses.
    Notebaert W; Soetens E
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 12684781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sequential processing of visual feature conjunction mismatches in the human brain.
    Wang Y; Cui L; Wang H; Tian S; Zhang X
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 14692997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.
    Kwak HW; Egeth H
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 1594435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding occurs at early stages of processing in children and adults.
    Theunissen EL; Alain C; Chevalier H; Taylor MJ
    Neuroreport; 2001 Jul; 12(9):1949-54. PubMed ID: 11435928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging, selective attention, and feature integration.
    Plude DJ; Doussard-Roosevelt JA
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Mar; 4(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 2803617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR; Behmer LP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1446-60. PubMed ID: 22777733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.
    Treisman A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):652-76. PubMed ID: 1834783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.