These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9530323)

  • 1. Reporting requirements for skeletal digital radiography: comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy presentation.
    O'Connor PJ; Davies AG; Fowler RC; Lintott DJ; Bury RF; Parkin GJ; Martinez D; Saifuddin A; Cowen AR
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):249-54. PubMed ID: 9530323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of hard- and soft-copy digital chest images with different matrix sizes for managing coronary care unit patients.
    Steckel RJ; Batra P; Johnson S; Sayre J; Brown K; Haker K; Young D; Zucker M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 7726034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing film and digital radiographs for reliability of pneumoconiosis classifications: a modeling approach.
    Sen A; Lee SY; Gillespie BW; Kazerooni EA; Goodsitt MM; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Petsonk EL; Wang ML; Franzblau A
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20207319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
    Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hard-copy versus soft-copy with and without simple image manipulation for detection of pulmonary nodules and masses.
    Kosuda S; Kaji T; Kobayashi H; Watanabe M; Iwasaki Y; Kusano S
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Sep; 41(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 11016758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Kundel HL; Gefter W; Aronchick J; Miller W; Hatabu H; Whitfill CH; Miller W
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft copy using image processing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions: is it actually cost-effective?
    Abe K; Kosuda S; Iwasaki Y; Hama Y; Kaji T; Kusano S; Ozeki Y; Ichihara K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 15648452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K x 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film.
    Brill PW; Winchester P; Cahill P; Lesser M; Durfee SM; Giess CS; Auld PA; Greenwald B
    Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 8657462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation.
    Reiner B; Siegel E; McLaurin T; Pomerantz S; Allman R; Hebel JR; Fritz S; Protopapas Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 8659358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Borg A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Sloth M; Petterson H
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8011377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of digital radiographs with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiosis.
    Franzblau A; Kazerooni EA; Sen A; Goodsitt MM; Lee SY; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Gillespie BW; Petsonk EL; Wang ML
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 19345120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed vs. film-screen magnification radiography of fingers in hyperparathyroidism. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Andersen R; Pettersson H
    Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7742125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
    Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.