These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9530841)

  • 1. Are false recognitions influenced by prerecognition processing?
    Wallace WP; Stewart MT; Shaffer TR; Wilson JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9530841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition.
    Norris D; McQueen JM; Cutler A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1209-28. PubMed ID: 8744962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity reductions in false recognition: a measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications.
    Westerberg CE; Marsolek CJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):747-59. PubMed ID: 14516210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition.
    Pitt MA; Samuel AG
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Oct; 29(2):149-88. PubMed ID: 7587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: false recognition and remember/know judgments.
    Wallace WP; Malone CP; Spoo AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Mar; 7(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 10780029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress and context in auditory word recognition.
    Slowiaczek LM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1991 Nov; 20(6):465-81. PubMed ID: 1757896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory.
    Roodenrys S; Hulme C; Lethbridge A; Hinton M; Nimmo LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1019-34. PubMed ID: 12450329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation.
    Wallace WP; Stewart MT; Sherman HL; Mellor MD
    Cognition; 1995 Apr; 55(1):85-113. PubMed ID: 7758271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit word activation during pre-recognition processing influences correct recognition and estimates of presentation frequency.
    Amberg MD; Yamashita JA; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15250178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.
    Metsala JL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9046869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.
    Roelofs A; Ozdemir R; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 17723068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision.
    Turner JE; Valentine T; Ellis AW
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1282-91. PubMed ID: 9847551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition.
    van Donselaar W; Koster M; Cutler A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):251-73. PubMed ID: 15903117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task.
    van Ooijen B
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Sep; 24(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 8870528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists.
    Goldinger SD; Pisoni DB; Logan JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 1826729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing.
    O'Rourke TB; Holcomb PJ
    Biol Psychol; 2002 Sep; 60(2-3):121-50. PubMed ID: 12270588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competitor priming in spoken word recognition.
    Monsell S; Hirsh KW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1495-520. PubMed ID: 9835063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.