These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 95309)

  • 1. Polarization properties of small-surface-area pacemaker electrodes--implications on reliability of sensing and pacing.
    Fischler H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Jul; 2(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 95309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fractally coated, 1.3 mm2 high impedance pacing electrode.
    Fröhlig G; Bolz A; Ströbel J; Rutz M; Lawall P; Schwerdt H; Schaldach M; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 21(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 9633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single lead DDD system: a comparative evaluation of unipolar, bipolar, and overlapping biphasic stimulation and the effects of right atrial floating electrode location on atrial pacing and sensing thresholds.
    Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK; Leung Z; Mehta N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1758-63. PubMed ID: 8945035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Stable stimulation impedance of steroid electrodes in various impulse amplitudes: indications for low polarization of the electrode-myocardium interface].
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH
    Z Kardiol; 1993 Jan; 82(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8470419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new efficient NanoTip lead.
    Stokes K; Bird T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1901-5. PubMed ID: 1704564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
    Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group.
    Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. PubMed ID: 8945049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of smaller electrode surface area (4 mm2) on steroid-eluting leads.
    Schuchert A; Kuck KH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Dec; 14(12):2098-104. PubMed ID: 1723192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intracardiac electrogram parameters, electrode surface area and pacer input impedance: their correlations.
    Antonioli EG; Baggioni FG; Grassi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(5):536-53. PubMed ID: 7450375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Basics of electrical cardiac stimulation].
    Koglek W
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2001 Sep; 12(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 27432330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chronic ventricular electrograms: do steroid-eluting leads differ from conventional leads?
    Schuchert A; Hopf M; Kuck KH; Bleifeld W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1879-82. PubMed ID: 1704559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activated pyrolytic carbon tip pacing leads: an alternative to steroid-eluting pacing leads?
    Masini M; Lazzari M; Lorenzoni R; Domicelli AM; Micheletti A; Dianda R; Masini G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1832-5. PubMed ID: 8945051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro estimation of the electrical performance of bipolar pacing electrode systems.
    Walton C; Economides AP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1791-6. PubMed ID: 2463549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial experience with 1.5-mm2 high impedance, steroid-eluting pacing electrodes.
    Fogel R; Pirzada F; Casavant D; Boone J; Bowman A; Steinhaus D; Gilbert M; Vlietstra R; Belott P; Parsonnet V; Tilton G; White M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 8834688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The porous endocardial electrode.
    Amundson DC; McArthur W; Mosharrafa M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Jan; 2(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 95264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chronic animal testing of new cardiac pacing electrodes.
    Adler S; Spehr P; Allen J; Block W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1896-900. PubMed ID: 1704563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of output capacitor, electrode and pulse width on power consumption in cardiac pacing.
    Edhag O; Lagergren H; Thorén A; Wahlberg I
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1978 Jan; 1(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 83615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of fractal-coated temporary pacing leads in the early postoperative course.
    Mellert F; Konietzko P; Schneider C; Gersing E; Kreuz J; Balta O; Preusse CJ; Welz A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18233973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure of demand pacing with small surface area electrodes.
    Hughes HC; Brownlee RR; Tyers GF
    Circulation; 1976 Jul; 54(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 1277416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.