These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Endocardial electrograms and pacemaker sensing. Hurzeler P; De Caprio V; Furman S Med Instrum; 1976; 10(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 958042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical use of low output settings in 1.2-mm2 steroid eluting electrodes: three years of experience. Danilovic D; Ohm OJ; Breivik K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2606-15. PubMed ID: 9894651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evolution of an active fixation atrial pacing lead. Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Frohlig G; Kusch O; Schieffer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1795-7. PubMed ID: 11139926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators. Leitch JW; Yee R; Klein GJ; Jones DL Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 1692124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group. Schuchert A; Van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. PubMed ID: 8945049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pacing threshold trends and variability in modern tined leads assessed using high resolution automatic measurements: conversion of pulse width into voltage thresholds. Danilovic D; Ohm OJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):567-87. PubMed ID: 10234710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Atrial and ventricular stimulation threshold development: a comparative study in patients with a DDD pacemaker and two identical carbon-tip leads. Brandt J; Attewell R; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 1695742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude in sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter. Wood MA; Moskovljevic P; Stambler BS; Ellenbogen KA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 8834684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Demand pacemaker arrhythmias caused by intermittent incomplete electrode fracture. Diagnosis with testing magnet. Coumel P; Mugica J; Barold SS Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jul; 36(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 50002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. High impedance low energy pacing leads: long-term results with a very small surface area steroid-eluting lead compared to three conventional electrodes. Moracchini PV; Cornacchia D; Bernasconi M; Tesorieri MC; Fabbri M; Marzegalli M; Baraldi P; Corte T; Giuliani M; Marotta T; de Seta F Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Feb; 22(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 10087548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Prerequisites for pacemaker electrodes for individual programming of a low stimulation impulse (comparison of an Elgiloy and a steroid-dependent pacemaker electrode)]. Schuchert A; Kuck KH; Bleifeld W Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2378158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Atrial fibrillation reduces the atrial impedance amplitude during cardiac cycle: a novel detection algorithm to improve recognition of atrial fibrillation in pacemaker patients. Schmidt B; Asbach S; Schweika O; Zehender M; Bode C; Faber TS Europace; 2007 Sep; 9(9):812-6. PubMed ID: 17545214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Atrial fibrillatory electrogram measurement allows atrial lead placement in patients who develop atrial fibrillation during permanent dual chamber pacemaker implantation. Wolfhard UF; Eichstaedt HC; Sack S; Dagres N; Knocks M; Schmid M; Splittgerber FH Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2300-3. PubMed ID: 9825336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Modern electrodes with and without steroid: effects on stimulation current of cardiac pacemakers]. Schuchert A; Kuck KH; Meinertz T Z Kardiol; 1995 Apr; 84(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 7785301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Electrophysiological performance of a bipolar membrane-coated titanium nitride electrode: a randomized comparison of steroid and nonsteroid lead designs. Wiegand UK; Zhdanov A; Stammwitz E; Crozier I; Claessens RJ; Meier J; Bos RJ; Bode F; Potratz J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jun; 22(6 Pt 1):935-41. PubMed ID: 10392392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]