389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9531956)
1. A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide and colony-stimulating factors is more cost-effective than granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors alone in mobilizing peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells.
Meisenberg B; Brehm T; Schmeckel A; Miller W; McMillan R
Transfusion; 1998 Feb; 38(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 9531956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.
Bashey A; Donohue M; Liu L; Medina B; Corringham S; Ihasz A; Carrier E; Castro JE; Holman PR; Xu R; Law P; Ball ED; Lane TA
Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2153-60. PubMed ID: 17958545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization.
Passos-Coelho JL; Braine HG; Davis JM; Huelskamp AM; Schepers KG; Ohly K; Clarke B; Wright SK; Noga SJ; Davidson NE
J Clin Oncol; 1995 Mar; 13(3):705-14. PubMed ID: 7533827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of thrombopoietin in combination with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.
Gajewski JL; Rondon G; Donato ML; Anderlini P; Korbling M; Ippoliti C; Benyunes M; Miller LL; LaTemple D; Jones D; Ashby M; Hellmann S; Durett A; Lauppe J; Geisler D; Khouri IF; Giralt SA; Andersson B; Ueno NT; Champlin R
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2002; 8(10):550-6. PubMed ID: 12434950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective.
Akard LP; Thompson JM; Dugan MJ; Wiemann M; Greenspan A; Hanks S; Swinney M; Nyhuis A; Jansen J
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1999; 5(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 10595815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization.
Bertolini F; Lanza A; Peccatori F; Zibera C; Gibelli N; Perotti C; Da Prada GA; Torretta L; Cocorocchio E; Martinelli G; Robustelli della Cuna G
Ann Oncol; 1998 Aug; 9(8):913-6. PubMed ID: 9789616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The composition of leukapheresis products impacts on the hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation independently of the mobilization regimen.
Menéndez P; Caballero MD; Prosper F; Del Cañizo MC; Pérez-Simón JA; Mateos MV; Nieto MJ; Corral M; Romero M; García-Conde J; Montalbán MA; San Miguel JF; Orfao A
Transfusion; 2002 Sep; 42(9):1159-72. PubMed ID: 12430673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature.
Jacoub JF; Suryadevara U; Pereyra V; Colón D; Fontelonga A; Mackintosh FR; Hall SW; Ascensão JL
Exp Hematol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 17046563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobilization of blood-derived stem and progenitor cells in normal subjects by granulocyte-macrophage- and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors.
Lane TA; Ho AD; Bashey A; Peterson S; Young D; Law P
Transfusion; 1999 Jan; 39(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 9920165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest.
Dettke M; Greinix HT; Kalhs P; Kührer I; Worel N; Höcker P
Transfusion; 2001 May; 41(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 11346706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.
Ballestrero A; Ferrando F; Garuti A; Basta P; Gonella R; Stura P; Mela GS; Sessarego M; Gobbi M; Patrone F
J Clin Oncol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):1296. PubMed ID: 10561192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF.
Gómez-Espuch J; Moraleda JM; Ortuño F; Lozano ML; Ayala F; Vallejo C; de Arriba F; Vicente V
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Feb; 25(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10673692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collection of more hematopoietic progenitor cells with large volume leukapheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.
Desikan KR; Jagannath S; Siegel D; Nelson J; Bracy D; Barlogie B; Tricot G
Leuk Lymphoma; 1998 Feb; 28(5-6):501-8. PubMed ID: 9613979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing dose and scheduling of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal volunteers.
Grigg AP; Roberts AW; Raunow H; Houghton S; Layton JE; Boyd AW; McGrath KM; Maher D
Blood; 1995 Dec; 86(12):4437-45. PubMed ID: 8541532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Similar breast cancer cell contamination of single-day peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections obtained after priming with hematopoietic growth factor alone or after cyclophosphamide followed by growth factor.
Passos-Coelho JL; Ross AA; Kahn DJ; Moss TJ; Davis JM; Huelskamp AM; Noga SJ; Davidson NE; Kennedy MJ
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Sep; 14(9):2569-75. PubMed ID: 8823337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
