These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9532386)
1. Dolly, cloning, and the public misunderstanding of science: a challenge for us all. Klotzko AJ Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 9532386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Voices from Roslin: the creators of Dolly discuss science, ethics, and social responsibility. Interview by Arlene Judith Klotzko. Bulfield G; Campbell K; James R; Wilmut I Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):121-40. PubMed ID: 9532387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Power without responsibility: media portrayals of Dolly and science. Wilkie T; Graham E Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 9532390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dolly: a new form of transgenic breedwealth. Franklin S Environ Values; 1997 Nov; 6(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 11656688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bad copies. How popular media represent cloning as an ethical problem. Hopkins PD Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(2):6-13. PubMed ID: 9589288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cloning in the popular imagination. Nelkin D; Lindee MS Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 9532389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. International response to Dolly: will scientific freedom get sheared? Cantrell MK J Law Health; 1998-1999; 13(1):69-102. PubMed ID: 10788222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cloning claim is science fiction, not science. Schatten G; Prather R; Wilmut I Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):344. PubMed ID: 12532976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors. Weasel LH; Jensen E New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Little lamb, who made thee? A letter from Edinburgh. Boyd KM Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 9532398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The regulation of technology. Warnock M Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 9532394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. After Dolly, a pharming frenzy. Pennisi E Science; 1998 Jan; 279(5351):646-8. PubMed ID: 9471724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific journals and public disputes. Nelkin D Lancet; 1998 Oct; 352 Suppl 2():SII25-8. PubMed ID: 9798643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dolly at 20: The inside story on the world's most famous sheep. Callaway E Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7609):604-8. PubMed ID: 27357776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media. Petersen A Soc Sci Med; 2001 Apr; 52(8):1255-68. PubMed ID: 11281408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Media, cloning, and bioethics]. Costa SI; Diniz D Cad Saude Publica; 2000; 16(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 10738160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cloning humans, cloning literature: genetics and the imagination deficit. Van Dijck J New Genet Soc; 1999; 18(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 17256208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First UK patents for cloning issued to creators of Dolly the sheep. Mayor S BMJ; 2000 Jan; 320(7230):270. PubMed ID: 10650016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The cloning of Dolly: dare humankind copy? van der Linde I S Afr Med J; 1998 Apr; 88(4):416, 419. PubMed ID: 9594978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]