These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9533125)

  • 1. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin.
    Bolnick DI; Doebeli M
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2433-49. PubMed ID: 14686521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict.
    Martin OY; Hosken DJ
    Curr Biol; 2004 May; 14(10):906-10. PubMed ID: 15186748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection and speciation in mammals, butterflies and spiders.
    Gage MJ; Parker GA; Nylin S; Wiklund C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Nov; 269(1507):2309-16. PubMed ID: 12495497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S
    Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6772):886-9. PubMed ID: 10706284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual conflict and evolution in Trinidadian guppies.
    Magurran AE
    Genetica; 2001; 112-113():463-74. PubMed ID: 11838783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict.
    Kimura M; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19505480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receptive females mitigate costs of sexual conflict.
    Harano T
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):320-7. PubMed ID: 25430865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.
    Hopkins BR; Perry JC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1426-1448. PubMed ID: 35249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impaired sperm quality, delayed mating but no costs for offspring fitness in crickets winning a fight.
    Tuni C; Perdigón Ferreira J; Fritz Y; Munoz Meneses A; Gasparini C
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1643-7. PubMed ID: 27116908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects.
    Arnqvist G; Edvardsson M; Friberg U; Nilsson T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Sep; 97(19):10460-4. PubMed ID: 10984538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females.
    Chapman T
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R744-54. PubMed ID: 16950101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-genomic sexual conflict drives antagonistic coevolution in harvester ants.
    Herrmann M; Cahan SH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.