1846 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9533125)
21. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance.
Moore AJ; Gowaty PA; Wallin WG; Moore PJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):517-23. PubMed ID: 11296864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intralocus sexual conflict.
van Doorn GS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Postmating sexual conflict and female control over fertilization during gamete interaction.
Firman RC
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jun; 1422(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 29524360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The evolution of optimal female mating rate changes the coevolutionary dynamics of female resistance and male persistence.
Kazancioğlu E; Alonzo SH
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2339-47. PubMed ID: 22777021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: a comparative study of polyandry and female fitness.
Wiklund C; Karlsson B; Leimar O
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Aug; 268(1477):1661-7. PubMed ID: 11506678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The evolution of harm--effect of sexual conflicts and population size.
Gay L; Hosken DJ; Eady P; Vasudev R; Tregenza T
Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 21050188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection.
Higashi M; Takimoto G; Yamamura N
Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):523-6. PubMed ID: 10591210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Female sexual polymorphism and fecundity consequences of male mating harassment in the wild.
Gosden TP; Svensson EI
PLoS One; 2007 Jun; 2(6):e580. PubMed ID: 17593979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.
Anholt RRH; O'Grady P; Wolfner MF; Harbison ST
Genetics; 2020 Jan; 214(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 31907301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Wigby S; Chapman T
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 16780504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evolution: sexual arms races.
Gage M
Curr Biol; 2004 May; 14(10):R378-80. PubMed ID: 15186761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
McKean KA; Nunney L
Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression.
Harano T; Okada K; Nakayama S; Miyatake T; Hosken DJ
Curr Biol; 2010 Nov; 20(22):2036-9. PubMed ID: 21055943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sexually dimorphic levels of color trait integration and the resolution of sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlids.
Brzozowski F; Roscoe J; Parsons K; Albertson C
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2012 Jun; 318(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 22821863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.
Parker GA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):235-59. PubMed ID: 16612884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does personality affect premating isolation between locally-adapted populations?
Sommer-Trembo C; Bierbach D; Arias-Rodriguez L; Verel Y; Jourdan J; Zimmer C; Riesch R; Streit B; Plath M
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16():138. PubMed ID: 27338278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A life-history perspective on sexual selection in a polygamous species.
Gao K; van Wijk M; Clement Z; Egas M; Groot AT
BMC Evol Biol; 2020 May; 20(1):53. PubMed ID: 32380947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered Sonoran topminnow.
Hurt CR; Farzin M; Hedrick PW
Genetics; 2005 Oct; 171(2):655-62. PubMed ID: 15972455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
