These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1851 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9533125)

  • 41. Reinforcement during ecological speciation.
    Kirkpatrick M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1473):1259-63. PubMed ID: 11410152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict.
    Rankin DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21054623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pervasive reinforcement and the role of sexual selection in biological speciation.
    Hudson EJ; Price TD
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():821-33. PubMed ID: 25149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gamete traits influence the variance in reproductive success, the intensity of sexual selection, and the outcome of sexual conflict among congeneric sea urchins.
    Levitan DR
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1305-16. PubMed ID: 18363865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10937179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila.
    Jaenike J; Dyer KA; Cornish C; Minhas MS
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):e325. PubMed ID: 17032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts.
    Harris WE; Moore PJ
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S64-71. PubMed ID: 15795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The combined effects of pre- and post-copulatory processes are masking sexual conflict over mating rate in Gerris buenoi.
    Devost E; Turgeon J
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 26468888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Incipient speciation in the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum: premating isolation between natural populations.
    Wade MJ; Chang NW; McNaughton M
    Heredity (Edinb); 1995 Nov; 75 ( Pt 5)():453-9. PubMed ID: 7591835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Correlated evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in a clade of neotropical harvestmen.
    Buzatto BA; Tomkins JL; Simmons LW; Machado G
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1671-86. PubMed ID: 24593685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Homage to Bateman: sex roles predict sex differences in sexual selection.
    Fritzsche K; Arnqvis G
    Evolution; 2013 Jul; 67(7):1926-36. PubMed ID: 23815650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.
    Lessells CM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Feb; 361(1466):301-17. PubMed ID: 16612889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 18513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon.
    Barson NJ; Aykanat T; Hindar K; Baranski M; Bolstad GH; Fiske P; Jacq C; Jensen AJ; Johnston SE; Karlsson S; Kent M; Moen T; Niemelä E; Nome T; Næsje TF; Orell P; Romakkaniemi A; Sægrov H; Urdal K; Erkinaro J; Lien S; Primmer CR
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):405-8. PubMed ID: 26536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experimental removal and elevation of sexual selection: does sexual selection generate manipulative males and resistant females?
    Crudgington HS; Beckerman AP; Brüstle L; Green K; Snook RR
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S72-87. PubMed ID: 15795864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 93.