105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9533329)
1. Histologic evaluation of the LaminOss osteocompressive dental screw: a pilot study.
Block CM; Tillmanns HW; Meffert RM
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Jul; 18(7):676-80, 682-4, 685. PubMed ID: 9533329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey.
Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH
J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in mandibular edentulous patients: a prospective observational report with 18-month data.
Drago CJ; Lazzara RJ
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16681501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs.
Knobloch L; Larsen PA; Rashid B; Carr AB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15214218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LaminOss immediate-load implants: I. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry.
Valen M; Locante WM
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11831318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Healing of Osseotite implants under submerged and immediate loading conditions in a single patient: a case report and interface analysis after 2 months.
Testori T; Szmukler-Moncler S; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Trisi P; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 12212681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and histologic evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a preliminary study in dogs.
Kohal RJ; De LaRosa M; Patrick D; Hürzeler MB; Caffesse RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):824-34. PubMed ID: 10612919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Part II: histomorphometric analysis.
Nkenke E; Fenner M; Vairaktaris EG; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 16161738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1) placed with dental implants in fresh extraction sites.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Rueger DC
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8699520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces.
Nergiz I; Arpak N; Bostanci H; Scorziello TM; Schmage P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 19492645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An histologic and histomorphometric study of bone reactions to unloaded and loaded non-submerged single implants in monkeys: a pilot study.
Piattelli A; Ruggeri A; Franchi M; Romasco N; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 8007025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LaminOss immediate-load implants: II. Clinical considerations of osteocompression.
Locante WM; Valen M
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 11831319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-etched implants loaded after 1- and 2-month healing periods: a histologic comparison in baboons.
Vernino AR; Kohles SS; Holt RA; Lee HM; Caudill RF; Kenealy JN
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12212687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses.
Todisco M; Trisi P
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 17009559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
