79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9533623)
1. Improved protein free energy calculation by more accurate treatment of nonbonded energy: application to chymotrypsin inhibitor 2, V57A.
Sugita Y; Kitao A
Proteins; 1998 Mar; 30(4):388-400. PubMed ID: 9533623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid boundary element solvation electrostatics calculations in folding simulations: successful folding of a 23-residue peptide.
Totrov M; Abagyan R
Biopolymers; 2001; 60(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 11455546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binding free energies and free energy components from molecular dynamics and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations. Application to amino acid recognition by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase.
Archontis G; Simonson T; Karplus M
J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 306(2):307-27. PubMed ID: 11237602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization.
Wernisch L; Hery S; Wodak SJ
J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):713-36. PubMed ID: 10966779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The generalized molecular fractionation with conjugate caps/molecular mechanics method for direct calculation of protein energy.
He X; Zhang JZ
J Chem Phys; 2006 May; 124(18):184703. PubMed ID: 16709127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cutoff size need not strongly influence molecular dynamics results for solvated polypeptides.
Beck DA; Armen RS; Daggett V
Biochemistry; 2005 Jan; 44(2):609-16. PubMed ID: 15641786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of computer simulation free-energy methods to compute the free energy of micellization as a function of micelle composition. 2. Implementation.
Stephenson BC; Stafford KA; Beers KJ; Blankschtein D
J Phys Chem B; 2008 Feb; 112(6):1641-56. PubMed ID: 18198857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulations of the peptide recognition at the consensus binding site of the constant fragment of human immunoglobulin G: the energy landscape analysis of a hot spot at the intermolecular interface.
Verkhivker GM; Bouzida D; Gehlhaar DK; Rejto PA; Freer ST; Rose PW
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(3):539-57. PubMed ID: 12112677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protein-ligand binding free energy calculation by the Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) Method.
Fukunishi Y; Mitomo D; Nakamura H
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1944-51. PubMed ID: 19807195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of hydrogen bonding and helix-lipid interactions in transmembrane helix association.
Lee J; Im W
J Am Chem Soc; 2008 May; 130(20):6456-62. PubMed ID: 18422318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amino acid conformational preferences and solvation of polar backbone atoms in peptides and proteins.
Avbelj F
J Mol Biol; 2000 Jul; 300(5):1335-59. PubMed ID: 10903873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of redox properties: understanding short- and long-range effects in rubredoxin.
Sulpizi M; Raugei S; VandeVondele J; Carloni P; Sprik M
J Phys Chem B; 2007 Apr; 111(15):3969-76. PubMed ID: 17388622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
Fromer M; Yanover C
Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid free energy calculation of peptide self-assembly by REMD umbrella sampling.
Wolf MG; Jongejan JA; Laman JD; de Leeuw SW
J Phys Chem B; 2008 Oct; 112(43):13493-8. PubMed ID: 18841883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum free energy pathways and free energy profiles for conformational transitions based on atomistic molecular dynamics simulations.
van der Vaart A; Karplus M
J Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 126(16):164106. PubMed ID: 17477588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic structure, binding energy, and solvation structure of the streptavidin-biotin supramolecular complex: ONIOM and 3D-RISM study.
Li Q; Gusarov S; Evoy S; Kovalenko A
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jul; 113(29):9958-67. PubMed ID: 19545155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the linear interaction energy method (LIE) to estimate the binding free energy values of Escherichia coli wild-type and mutant arginine repressor C-terminal domain (ArgRc)-l-arginine and ArgRc-l-citrulline protein-ligand complexes.
Asi AM; Rahman NA; Merican AF
J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Mar; 22(4):249-62. PubMed ID: 15177077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. pKa calculations in solution and proteins with QM/MM free energy perturbation simulations: a quantitative test of QM/MM protocols.
Riccardi D; Schaefer P; Cui Q
J Phys Chem B; 2005 Sep; 109(37):17715-33. PubMed ID: 16853267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
