These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9534099)

  • 1. Role of trough to peak efficacy in the evaluation of antihypertensive therapy.
    Meredith PA
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1998 Jan; 16(1):S59-64. PubMed ID: 9534099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA guidelines on trough: peak ratios in the evaluation of antihypertensive agents. United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Meredith PA; Elliott HL
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1994; 23 Suppl 5():S26-30. PubMed ID: 7609502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antihypertensive treatment and trough: peak ratio: general considerations.
    Meredith PA; Elliott HL
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1994 Nov; 12(8):S79-82; discussion S83. PubMed ID: 7707161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical relevance of the 24-hour trough: peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs.
    Zannad F
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1995 Aug; 13(2):S109-12. PubMed ID: 8576780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blood pressure variability: clinical implications and effects of antihypertensive treatment.
    Parati G; Ravogli A; Frattola A; Groppelli A; Ulian L; Santucciu C; Mancia G
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1994 Jul; 12(5):S35-40. PubMed ID: 7965285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The trough/peak ratio].
    Salvetti A; Virdis A
    Ann Ital Med Int; 1995 Oct; 10 Suppl():91S-95S. PubMed ID: 8562276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What are the approaches for evaluating antihypertensive treatment by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
    Neutel JM; Smith DH; Weber MA
    Blood Press Monit; 1999; 4 Suppl 2():S23-8. PubMed ID: 10822419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trough: peak ratio: the rationale behind the United States Food and Drug Administration recommendations.
    Lipicky RJ
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1994 Nov; 12(8):S17-8; discussion S18-9. PubMed ID: 7707150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New FDA guidelines on the treatment of hypertension: comparison of different therapeutic classes according to trough/peak blood pressure responses.
    Meredith PA
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1994 Nov; 87(11):1423-9. PubMed ID: 7771888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of once-daily antihypertensive therapy.
    Myers MG
    Heart Dis; 2000; 2(2):S7-12. PubMed ID: 11728257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of trough:peak ratio and the assessment of anti-hypertensive drug action.
    Elliott HL; Meredith PA
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jun; 9(6):423-7. PubMed ID: 7473522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [How relevant is the trough-to peak ratio?].
    Ferrari P
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 Mar; 130(9):329-35. PubMed ID: 10746273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home to evaluate drug effects by the trough: peak ratio.
    Ménard J; Chatellier G; Day M; Vaur L
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1994 Nov; 12(8):S21-5. PubMed ID: 7707151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The trough-to-peak ratio in the evaluation of an antihypertensive drug].
    Mancia G; Salvetti A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Aug; 24(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 7958635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antihypertensive effect of drugs: statistical distribution of the trough-to-peak ratio.
    Chi VX; Chau NP
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):286-90. PubMed ID: 8934597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of trough:peak ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive drug therapy.
    Myers MG
    Can J Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 10 Suppl D():17D-20D. PubMed ID: 7954034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trough: peak ratio and twenty-four-hour blood pressure control.
    Elliott HL
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1994 Jul; 12(5):S29-33. PubMed ID: 7965283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Retrospective studies and prospects of therapy for hypertension].
    Maisch B; Brilla C; Kruse T; Noll B; Bethge C
    Herz; 1995 Dec; 20(6):370-89. PubMed ID: 8582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correct administration of antihypertensive drugs according to the principles of clinical pharmacology.
    Taddei S; Bruno RM; Ghiadoni L
    Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2011; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 21265580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical benefits of a consistent reduction in blood pressure.
    Mancia G; Cattaneo BM; Omboni S; Grassi G
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1998 Oct; 16(6):S35-9. PubMed ID: 9856382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.