124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9534113)
1. Staff:staff and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Rapley M; Ridgway J; Beyer S
J Intellect Disabil Res; 1998 Feb; 42 ( Pt 1)():37-42. PubMed ID: 9534113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship of staff:client ratios, interactions, and residential placement.
Felce D; Repp AC; Thomas M; Ager A; Blunden R
Res Dev Disabil; 1991; 12(3):315-31. PubMed ID: 1792360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The behavioral and social ecology of community houses.
Felce D; Repp A
Res Dev Disabil; 1992; 13(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 1585020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Empowerment factor.
Stancliffe RJ
J Intellect Disabil Res; 1999 Jun; 43 ( Pt 3)():185-93. PubMed ID: 10392605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q).
Albuquerque CP
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2012 Sep; 25(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 22890945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of an assessment used in formal accommodation services: implications for adults with an intellectual disability.
Milasinovic V; Buchanan A
J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Dec; 38(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24279782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial validation of the Chinese Quality of Life Questionnaire-Intellectual Disabilities (CQOL-ID): a cultural perspective.
Wong PK; Wong DF; Schalock RL; Chou YC
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Jun; 55(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 21435068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and utility of the Behaviour Support Plan Quality Evaluation tool (BSP-QEII) for auditing and quality development in services for adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour.
McVilly K; Webber L; Paris M; Sharp G
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Aug; 57(8):716-27. PubMed ID: 22845772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factor stability of the Schalock and Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Kober R; Eggleton IR
Ment Retard; 2002 Apr; 40(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 11925270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability.
Nota L; Ferrari L; Soresi S; Wehmeyer M
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2007 Nov; 51(Pt 11):850-65. PubMed ID: 17910537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-rater reliability of professional-caregiver-reported life events in adults with intellectual disabilities.
Hove O; Assmus J; Braatveit K; Havik OE
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2017 Jul; 61(7):697-706. PubMed ID: 28612474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional abilities and cognitive decline in adult and aging intellectual disabilities. Psychometric validation of an Italian version of the Alzheimer's Functional Assessment Tool (AFAST): analysis of its clinical significance with linear statistics and artificial neural networks.
De Vreese LP; Gomiero T; Uberti M; De Bastiani E; Weger E; Mantesso U; Marangoni A
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2015 Apr; 59(4):370-84. PubMed ID: 24397351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factor structure of the Schalock and Keith Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q): validation on Mexican and Spanish samples.
Caballo C; Crespo M; Jenaro C; Verdugo MA; Martinez JL
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2005 Oct; 49(Pt 10):773-6. PubMed ID: 16162126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrater reliability of the Motivation Assessment Scale: failure to replicate with aggressive behavior.
Sigafoos J; Kerr M; Roberts D
Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7997635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the HIV overview of problems evaluation system (HOPES) in assessing the quality of life of patients with AIDS and symptomatic HIV infection.
De Boer JB; Sprangers MA; Aaronson NK; Lange JM; van Dam FS
Qual Life Res; 1996 Jun; 5(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 8763802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric evaluation of the Italian version of the AADS questionnaire: a caregiver-rated tool for the assessment of behavioral deficits and excesses in persons with intellectual disabilities and dementia.
De Vreese LP; Mantesso U; De Bastiani E; Marangoni A; Gomiero T
Int Psychogeriatr; 2011 Sep; 23(7):1124-32. PubMed ID: 21429278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A scale for evaluating emotional disorders in severely and profoundly mentally retarded persons. Development of the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped (DASH) scale.
Matson JL; Gardner WI; Coe DA; Sovner R
Br J Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 159():404-9. PubMed ID: 1958951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is talked about? Community living staff experiences of talking with older people with intellectual disability about dying and death.
Wiese M; Stancliffe RJ; Dew A; Balandin S; Howarth G
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2014 Jul; 58(7):679-90. PubMed ID: 23870022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Picture activity schedules and engagement of adults with mental retardation in a group home.
Anderson MD; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB; McAdam D
Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(4):231-50. PubMed ID: 9216024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01) in community-based adults with intellectual disabilities: reliability and concurrent validity vis-à-vis the Inventory for Client and Agency Planning (ICAP).
van Ingen DJ; Moore LL; Zaja RH; Rojahn J
Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 19800760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
