These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Bogacki RE; Hunt RJ; del Aguila M; Smith WR Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 12216568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations. Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision]. Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. York AK; Arthur JS Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 8152990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment. Sjögren P; Halling A Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients. Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry. Douglas WH J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 9120612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice. Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]