BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9534414)

  • 1. The status of restorative dental materials.
    Brown D
    Dent Update; 1997 Dec; 24(10):402-6. PubMed ID: 9534414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The status of indirect restorative dental materials.
    Brown D
    Dent Update; 1998; 25(1):23-8, 30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 9709598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Our future in restorative dental materials.
    Bayne SC
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):175-83. PubMed ID: 11323860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional stability of dental restorative materials and cements over four years.
    Hermesch CB; Wall BS; McEntire JF
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 15055648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the Nd:YAP laser on coronal restorative materials: implications for endodontic retreatment.
    Blum JY; Peli JF; Abadie MJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11199799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?
    Mackert JR; Wahl MJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 15468542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The future of gold restorations.
    Giblin JP
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1989 Oct; 10():115-9. PubMed ID: 2489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Future directions in bonding resins to the dentine-pulp complex.
    Bouillaguet S; Wataha JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 15089947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of anterior restorative materials.
    Sockwell C
    Dent Clin North Am; 1976 Apr; 20(2):403-22. PubMed ID: 767176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is amalgam in child dental care on its way out? Restorative materials used in children and adolescents in 1978 and 1995 in Norway.
    Wang NJ
    Community Dent Health; 2000 Jun; 17(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 11349994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.