These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9534729)
1. Cardiac imaging: present status and future trends. Rees M Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70 Spec No():S162-7. PubMed ID: 9534729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocardial viability: methods of assessment and clinical relevance. Iskandrian AS; Heo J; Schelbert HR Am Heart J; 1996 Dec; 132(6):1226-35. PubMed ID: 8969575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease]. Kiraç S Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sophisticated technology is not a substitute for cognitive cardiology. O'Rourke RA; Fuster V Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2007 Oct; 4(10):519. PubMed ID: 17893681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Role of noninvasive imaging in cardiology]. Gaemperli O Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Jan; 102(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23384928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Berman DS; Hachamovitch R; Shaw LJ; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Fieno DS; Germano G; Slomka P; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 16391190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nuclear cardiology: the present functions and future perspectives]. Mei X; Fan C Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 30(1):191-4, 212. PubMed ID: 23488162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Imaging modalities in cardiology: the present answers to permanent questions]. Barba J; Bastarrika G; García Velloso MJ Rev Med Univ Navarra; 2005; 49(3):31-40. PubMed ID: 16400974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: going toward an integrated imaging approach. Petretta M; Costanzo P; Acampa W; Imbriaco M; Ferro A; Filardi PP; Cuocolo A J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Oct; 9(10):977-86. PubMed ID: 18799959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [From nuclear cardiology towards molecular cardiology]. Muxí A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Candell J; de Caralt TM Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2009; 28(6):271-2. PubMed ID: 19931093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI assessment of myocardial viability: comparison with other imaging techniques. Baer FM; Theissen P; Schneider CA; Kettering K; Voth E; Sechtem U; Schicha H Rays; 1999; 24(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 10358387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Patel MR; Dehmer GJ; Hirshfeld JW; Smith PK; Spertus JA J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Feb; 59(9):857-81. PubMed ID: 22296741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: the nuclear medicine physicians' view]. Gratz S; Kaiser W; Höffken H Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Oct; 136(41):2094-9. PubMed ID: 21971885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Nuclear cardiology: will we need it in the future?]. Sechtem U Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Mar; 129(13):693-6. PubMed ID: 15026966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization : a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Patel MR; Dehmer GJ; Hirshfeld JW; Smith PK; Spertus JA; Masoudi FA; Brindis RG; Beckman KJ; Chambers CE; Ferguson TB; Garcia MJ; Grover FL; Holmes DR; Klein LW; Limacher M; Mack MJ; Malenka DJ; Park MH; Ragosta M; Ritchie JL; Rose GA; Rosenberg AB; Shemin RJ; Weintraub WS; Wolk MJ; Allen JM; Douglas PS; Hendel RC; Peterson ED Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 73(3):E1-24. PubMed ID: 19127535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for medical management versus revascularization for coronary artery disease: guidance from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Mehta LS; Raman SV; Ghosh S Semin Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 47(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 22657112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]